Linux RAID subsystem development
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de>
To: Jonathan Molyneux <jonathan@infinitedepth.com.au>
Cc: linux RAID <linux-raid@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: raid10 - won't rebuild - assigns all added disks as spares
Date: Tue, 25 Nov 2014 13:28:10 +1100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20141125132810.3b4aa867@notabene.brown> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <5473E018.3020507@infinitedepth.com.au>

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1788 bytes --]

On Tue, 25 Nov 2014 12:49:12 +1100 Jonathan Molyneux
<jonathan@infinitedepth.com.au> wrote:

> Hi Everyone,
> 
> Have a strange situation that hasn't happened before.
> Running Debian 7.7 with kernel version 3.2.63-2+deb7u1.
> Have a raid10 that runs the server (boot's off a raid1) that after 
> replacing a failed disk, just won't rebuild.
> 
> This is what it looks like without the disk (failed & removed):
> md1 : active raid10 sda2[6] sdc2[4] sdb2[1]
>        1952987136 blocks super 1.2 512K chunks 2 far-copies [4/3] [UUU_]
>        bitmap: 8/15 pages [32KB], 65536KB chunk
> 
> Then when the disk is added:
> md1 : active raid10 sdd2[5](S) sda2[6] sdc2[4] sdb2[1]
>        1952987136 blocks super 1.2 512K chunks 2 far-copies [4/3] [UUU_]
>        bitmap: 8/15 pages [32KB], 65536KB chunk
> 
> Nothing unusual is being spat out in dmesg.
> When removing the disk:
> [313434.073997] md: unbind<sdd2>
> [313434.138307] md: export_rdev(sdd2)
> When adding the disk:
> [313468.056484] md: bind<sdd2>
> 
> This is a strange one that I haven't had before.
> Any thoughts on how to kick the rebuild off without needing a reboot ?

I'm sure I've seen this bug before... and fixed it.
I don't remember the details and cannot find anything obvious in change logs.

You could try

   echo recover > /sys/block/md1/md/sync_action

Alternately, if you are re-adding a disk that had just been removed, you could

   mdadm /dev/md1 --remove /dev/sdd2
   mdadm --zero /dev/sdd2
   mdadm /dev/md1 --add /dev/sdd2

that will force a full recovery instead of just a bitmap-based recovery.
That will of course take longer than a bitmap-based recover, but seeing the
bitmap based recovery isn't starting, that could still be an improvement.

NeilBrown

[-- Attachment #2: OpenPGP digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 811 bytes --]

  reply	other threads:[~2014-11-25  2:28 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2014-11-25  1:49 raid10 - won't rebuild - assigns all added disks as spares Jonathan Molyneux
2014-11-25  2:28 ` NeilBrown [this message]
2014-11-25  3:44   ` Jonathan Molyneux

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20141125132810.3b4aa867@notabene.brown \
    --to=neilb@suse.de \
    --cc=jonathan@infinitedepth.com.au \
    --cc=linux-raid@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox