From: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de>
To: Joe Lawrence <joe.lawrence@stratus.com>
Cc: linux-raid@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: LVM RAID1 syncing component
Date: Tue, 2 Dec 2014 08:41:11 +1100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20141202084111.6514ec79@notabene.brown> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20141201161947.1d503df9@jlaw-desktop.mno.stratus.com>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1759 bytes --]
On Mon, 1 Dec 2014 16:19:47 -0500 Joe Lawrence <joe.lawrence@stratus.com>
wrote:
> On Thu, 27 Nov 2014 07:41:58 +1100
> NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de> wrote:
>
> > On Mon, 24 Nov 2014 23:07:32 -0500 Joe Lawrence <joe.lawrence@stratus.com>
> > wrote:
> >
> > > Does anyone know how its possible to determine which side of an LVM RAID 1
> > > is the stale partner during RAID resync?
> > >
> > > In ordinary MD RAID, I believe you can check
> > > /sys/block/md0/md/dev-XXX/state,
> >
> > Why do you believe that?
> >
> > During a resync (after an unclean shutdown) the devices are indistinguishable.
> > RAID1 reads all drives and if there is a difference it chooses one data block
> > to write to the others - always the one with the lowest index number.
> >
> > So with md or LVM it is the same: first "first" is "copied" to the "second".
>
> Hi Neil,
>
> Here's a quick example of my thought-process, where md2 is an in-sync
> RAID1 of sdq2 and sdr2 with an internal write bitmap:
>
> % mdadm --fail /dev/md3 /dev/sdr2
> % mdadm --remove /dev/md3 /dev/sdr2
You are referring to what I would call "recovery", not "resync"
(which is why I put "(after an unclean shutdown)" in my answer to make it
clear what circumstances I was talking about).
resync: fixing things after an unclean shutdown
recovery: restoring data after a device has been removed an another
(or possibly the same) added.
I think
dmsetup info
should provide the info you want.
One of the fields is a sequence of letters 'D', 'a', 'A'.
* Status characters:
* 'D' = Dead/Failed device
* 'a' = Alive but not in-sync
* 'A' = Alive and in-sync
Does that provide the information you wanted?
NeilBrown
[-- Attachment #2: OpenPGP digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 811 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-12-01 21:41 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-11-25 4:07 LVM RAID1 syncing component Joe Lawrence
2014-11-26 5:42 ` Chris Murphy
2014-11-26 13:20 ` Joe Lawrence
2014-11-26 20:41 ` NeilBrown
2014-11-29 15:26 ` Peter Grandi
2014-12-01 23:28 ` NeilBrown
2014-12-01 21:19 ` Joe Lawrence
2014-12-01 21:27 ` Joe Lawrence
2014-12-01 21:41 ` NeilBrown [this message]
2014-12-02 19:05 ` Joe Lawrence
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20141202084111.6514ec79@notabene.brown \
--to=neilb@suse.de \
--cc=joe.lawrence@stratus.com \
--cc=linux-raid@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).