From: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de>
To: Anshuman Aggarwal <anshuman.aggarwal@gmail.com>
Cc: Mdadm <linux-raid@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: Split RAID: Proposal for archival RAID using incremental batch checksum
Date: Wed, 17 Dec 2014 08:49:21 +1100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20141217084921.360ca442@notabene.brown> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAK-d5db_ubRobL=uiia_9yOFA0PMovptAG8O+Y17ORT_--FsQg@mail.gmail.com>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1928 bytes --]
On Tue, 16 Dec 2014 21:55:15 +0530 Anshuman Aggarwal
<anshuman.aggarwal@gmail.com> wrote:
> On 2 December 2014 at 17:26, Anshuman Aggarwal
> <anshuman.aggarwal@gmail.com> wrote:
> > It works! (Atleast on a sample 5 MB device with 5 x 1MB partitions :-)
> > will find more space on my drives and do a larger test but don't see
> > why it shouldn't work)
> > Here are the following caveats (and questions):
> > - Neil, like you pointed out, the power of 2 chunk size will probably
> > need a code change (in the kernel or only in the userspace tool?)
In the kernel too.
> > - Any performance or other reasons why a terabyte size chunk may
> > not be feasible?
Not that I can think of.
> > - Implications of safe_mode_delay
> > - Would the metadata be updated on the block device be written to
> > and the parity device as well?
Probably. Hard to give a specific answer to vague question.
> > - If the drive fails which is the same as the drive being written
> > to, would that lack of metadata updates to the other devices affect
> > reconstruction?
Again, to give a precise answer, a detailed question is needed. Obviously
any change would have to made in such a way to ensure that things which
needed to work, did work.
> > - Adding new devices (is it possible to move the parity to the disk
> > being added? How does device addition work for RAID4 ...is it added as
> > a zero-ed out device with parity disk remaining the same)
RAID5 or RAID6 with ALGORITHM_PARITY_0 puts the parity on the early devices.
Currently if you add a device to such an array ...... I'm not sure what it
will do. It should be possible to make it just write zeros out.
NeilBrown
> >
> >
>
> Neil, sorry to try to bump this thread. Could you please look over the
> questions and address the points on the remaining items that can make
> it a working solution? Thanks
[-- Attachment #2: OpenPGP digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 811 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-12-16 21:49 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 28+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-10-29 7:15 Split RAID: Proposal for archival RAID using incremental batch checksum Anshuman Aggarwal
2014-10-29 7:32 ` Roman Mamedov
2014-10-29 8:31 ` Anshuman Aggarwal
2014-10-29 9:05 ` NeilBrown
2014-10-29 9:25 ` Anshuman Aggarwal
2014-10-29 19:27 ` Ethan Wilson
2014-10-30 14:57 ` Anshuman Aggarwal
2014-10-30 17:25 ` Piergiorgio Sartor
2014-10-31 11:05 ` Anshuman Aggarwal
2014-10-31 14:25 ` Matt Garman
2014-11-01 12:55 ` Piergiorgio Sartor
2014-11-06 2:29 ` Anshuman Aggarwal
2014-10-30 15:00 ` Anshuman Aggarwal
2014-11-03 5:52 ` NeilBrown
2014-11-03 18:04 ` Piergiorgio Sartor
2014-11-06 2:24 ` Anshuman Aggarwal
2014-11-24 7:29 ` Anshuman Aggarwal
2014-11-24 22:50 ` NeilBrown
2014-11-26 6:24 ` Anshuman Aggarwal
2014-12-01 16:00 ` Anshuman Aggarwal
2014-12-01 16:34 ` Anshuman Aggarwal
2014-12-01 21:46 ` NeilBrown
2014-12-02 11:56 ` Anshuman Aggarwal
2014-12-16 16:25 ` Anshuman Aggarwal
2014-12-16 21:49 ` NeilBrown [this message]
2014-12-17 6:40 ` Anshuman Aggarwal
2015-01-06 11:40 ` Anshuman Aggarwal
[not found] ` <CAJvUf-BktH_E6jb5d94VuMVEBf_Be4i_8u_kBYU52Df1cu0gmg@mail.gmail.com>
2014-11-01 5:36 ` Anshuman Aggarwal
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20141217084921.360ca442@notabene.brown \
--to=neilb@suse.de \
--cc=anshuman.aggarwal@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-raid@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).