linux-raid.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Aryeh Leib Taurog <vim@aryehleib.com>
To: linux-raid@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Reassembling RAID1 after good drive was offline [newbie]
Date: Sun, 4 Jan 2015 12:20:09 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20150104102009.GA4511@deb76.aryehleib.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <54A6E5B1.2090602@tigertech.com>

On Fri, Jan 02, 2015 at 6:38 PM, Robert L Mathews wrote:
> Your question is about how to reassemble them without a resync,  
> which is understandable, but the reason md isn't doing that 
> automatically is that it thinks they might be different.
 
> I personally would always do a resync in such a case. A flaky cable 
> suggests that data on it is suspect, and this is one of the things  
> RAID 1 is for: it allows you to copy clean data to suspect 
> partitions.

> But I'm known to be data-paranoid. Other people may have different 
> opinions/suggestions.

Thanks.  I tend to agree.  Would the resync just copy all the data 
from the "good" drive back to the "failed" drive?  For diagnostic 
purposes, it would actually be a lot more informative to compare the 
two drives and see if there really is data corruption on one of them 
or not.  Is there a way to do that?  If I were to demonstrate that the 
data are in sync, I would want to reassemble without resync.

Also, in my situation, since for now I'm just using a pair of external 
drives, I could easily imagine accidentally trying to assemble the 
array when one of the drives is powered down.  Then this situation 
would arise again without faulty hardware.  I suppose an 'assemble' 
script could help protect against the latter case by checking first 
that both devices are available.

Prudence notwithstanding, I do think there are valid cases for 
reassembling this array without resync.  If there's a way to do that, 
I'd still like to know.

With appreciation,
Aryeh Leib Taurog

  reply	other threads:[~2015-01-04 10:20 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2015-01-01 17:40 Reassembling RAID1 after good drive was offline [newbie] Aryeh Leib Taurog
2015-01-01 20:54 ` Robert L Mathews
2015-01-02 11:01   ` Anthonys Lists
2015-01-02 14:02     ` Aryeh Leib Taurog
2015-01-02 13:01   ` Aryeh Leib Taurog
2015-01-02 18:38     ` Robert L Mathews
2015-01-04 10:20       ` Aryeh Leib Taurog [this message]
2015-01-04 11:10         ` Peter Grandi
2015-01-04 21:07           ` Aryeh Leib Taurog
2015-01-04 21:45             ` Wols Lists
2015-01-05 17:25               ` Robert L Mathews
2015-01-05 18:54               ` NeilBrown
2015-01-07  8:30                 ` Aryeh Leib Taurog

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20150104102009.GA4511@deb76.aryehleib.com \
    --to=vim@aryehleib.com \
    --cc=linux-raid@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).