linux-raid.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de>
To: Nate Dailey <nate.dailey@stratus.com>
Cc: linux-raid@vger.kernel.org, linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: raid1 narrow_write_error with 4K disks, sd "bad block number requested" messages
Date: Thu, 5 Feb 2015 15:59:53 +1100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20150205155953.64e9b1e4@notabene.brown> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <54C9006A.2030807@stratus.com>

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1942 bytes --]

On Wed, 28 Jan 2015 10:29:46 -0500 Nate Dailey <nate.dailey@stratus.com>
wrote:

> I'm writing about something that appears to be an issue with raid1's 
> narrow_write_error, particular to non-512-byte-sector disks. Here's what 
> I'm doing:
> 
> - 2 disk raid1, 4K disks, each connected to a different SAS HBA
> - mount a filesystem on the raid1, run a test that writes to it
> - remove one of the SAS HBAs (echo 1 > 
> /sys/bus/pci/devices/0000\:45\:00.0/remove)
> 
> At this point, writes fail and narrow_write_error breaks them up and 
> retries, one sector at a time. But these are 512-byte sectors, and sd 
> doesn't like it:
> 
> [ 2645.310517] sd 3:0:1:0: [sde] Bad block number requested
> [ 2645.310610] sd 3:0:1:0: [sde] Bad block number requested
> [ 2645.310690] sd 3:0:1:0: [sde] Bad block number requested
> ...
> 
> There appears to be no real harm done, but there can be a huge number of 
> these messages in the log.
> 
> I can avoid this by disabling bad block tracking, but it looks like 
> maybe the superblock's bblog_shift is intended to address this exact 
> issue. However, I don't see a way to change it. Presumably this is 
> something mdadm should be setting up? I don't see bblog_shift ever set 
> to anything other than 0.
> 
> This is on a RHEL 7.1 kernel, version 3.10.0-221.el7. I took a look at 
> upstream sd and md changes and nothing jumps out at me that would have 
> affected this (but I have not tested to see if the bad block messages do 
> or do not happen on an upstream kernel).
> 
> I'd appreciate any advice re: how to handle this. Thanks!

Thanks for the report.

narrow_write_error() should use bdev_logical_block_size() and round up to
that.
Possibly mdadm should get the same information and set bblog_shift
accordingly when creating a bad block log.

I've made a note to fix that, but I'm happy to review  patches too :-)

thanks,
NeilBrown


[-- Attachment #2: OpenPGP digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 811 bytes --]

  reply	other threads:[~2015-02-05  4:59 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2015-01-28 15:29 raid1 narrow_write_error with 4K disks, sd "bad block number requested" messages Nate Dailey
2015-02-05  4:59 ` NeilBrown [this message]
2015-02-12 16:46   ` Nate Dailey
2015-02-13  6:01     ` NeilBrown

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20150205155953.64e9b1e4@notabene.brown \
    --to=neilb@suse.de \
    --cc=linux-raid@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=nate.dailey@stratus.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).