From: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de>
To: Chris <email.bug@arcor.de>
Cc: linux-raid@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: What are mdadm maintainers to do? (was: desktop disk's error recovery timeouts)
Date: Tue, 17 Feb 2015 10:49:06 +1100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20150217104906.62d36c62@notabene.brown> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <loom.20150216T183419-387@post.gmane.org>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1067 bytes --]
On Mon, 16 Feb 2015 17:48:50 +0000 (UTC) Chris <email.bug@arcor.de> wrote:
>
> Thank you for the additional information, it calls for action.
>
>
> OK, calling for a solution to stop desktop drives from causing data loss and
> affecting the mdadm reputation:
>
>
> I gather that mdadm could ship with one additional udev rule that calls a
> script to check/set scterc, or falls back to increasing the system timout.
>
> Phil, you mentioned having posted such a script, could you prepare it for
> addition to the mdadm package?
>
>
> Would maintainers be ok with adding such a udev rule and script to the package?
"maintainers" ? Plural? That would be nice.
Unfortunately there is just the one singular me....
There are certainly other contributors who
- answer questions on the list
- provide bug reports
- provide bits of code
and I am very thankful to them. But I haven't found a likely co-maintainer
yet :-(
I'm certainly happy to consider and concrete proposal. The more concrete,
the better.
NeilBrown
[-- Attachment #2: OpenPGP digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 811 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-02-16 23:49 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 24+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-02-14 21:59 re-add POLICY Chris
2015-02-15 19:03 ` re-add POLICY: conflict detection? Chris
2015-02-16 3:28 ` re-add POLICY NeilBrown
2015-02-16 12:23 ` Chris
2015-02-16 13:17 ` Phil Turmel
2015-02-16 16:15 ` desktop disk's error recovery timouts (was: re-add POLICY) Chris
2015-02-16 17:19 ` desktop disk's error recovery timouts Phil Turmel
2015-02-16 17:48 ` What are mdadm maintainers to do? (was: desktop disk's error recovery timeouts) Chris
2015-02-16 19:44 ` What are mdadm maintainers to do? Phil Turmel
2015-02-16 23:49 ` NeilBrown [this message]
2015-02-17 7:52 ` What are mdadm maintainers to do? (error recovery redundancy/data loss) Chris
2015-02-17 8:48 ` Mikael Abrahamsson
2015-02-17 10:37 ` Chris
2015-02-17 19:33 ` Chris Murphy
2015-02-17 22:47 ` Adam Goryachev
2015-02-18 1:02 ` Chris Murphy
2015-02-18 11:04 ` Chris
2015-02-19 6:12 ` Chris Murphy
2015-02-20 5:12 ` Roger Heflin
2015-02-17 23:33 ` Chris
2015-02-18 15:04 ` help with the little script (erc timout fix) Chris
2015-02-18 21:25 ` NeilBrown
2015-02-17 15:09 ` re-add POLICY Chris
2015-02-22 13:23 ` Chris
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20150217104906.62d36c62@notabene.brown \
--to=neilb@suse.de \
--cc=email.bug@arcor.de \
--cc=linux-raid@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).