From: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de>
To: Jes.Sorensen@redhat.com
Cc: artur.paszkiewicz@intel.com, linux-raid@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/5] Check return of stat() to avoid covscan complaining
Date: Wed, 25 Feb 2015 08:12:43 +1100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20150225081243.1fe91420@notabene.brown> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1424811640-26569-3-git-send-email-Jes.Sorensen@redhat.com>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 2608 bytes --]
On Tue, 24 Feb 2015 16:00:37 -0500 Jes.Sorensen@redhat.com wrote:
> From: Jes Sorensen <Jes.Sorensen@redhat.com>
>
> Signed-off-by: Jes Sorensen <Jes.Sorensen@redhat.com>
> ---
> Assemble.c | 6 +++++-
> 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/Assemble.c b/Assemble.c
> index 131f871..b392214 100644
> --- a/Assemble.c
> +++ b/Assemble.c
> @@ -688,7 +688,11 @@ static int load_devices(struct devs *devices, char *devmap,
> close(dfd);
> }
>
> - stat(devname, &stb);
> + if (stat(devname, &stb)) {
> + pr_err("Unsable to stat(%s) - skipping device.\n",
> + devname);
> + continue;
> + }
>
> if (c->verbose > 0)
> pr_err("%s is identified as a member of %s, slot %d%s.\n",
I've applied the other 4. I think I'd rather this one was fixed by changing
stat(devname,
to
fstat(dfd,
and keep dfd open a bit longer.
Does this look OK to you?
Thanks,
NeilBrown
diff --git a/Assemble.c b/Assemble.c
index 131f871a6d1e..1e529c1b3126 100644
--- a/Assemble.c
+++ b/Assemble.c
@@ -576,13 +576,13 @@ static int load_devices(struct devs *devices, char *devmap,
struct stat stb;
struct supertype *tst;
int i;
+ int dfd;
if (tmpdev->used != 1)
continue;
/* looks like a good enough match to update the super block if needed */
#ifndef MDASSEMBLE
if (c->update) {
- int dfd;
/* prepare useful information in info structures */
struct stat stb2;
int err;
@@ -652,7 +652,6 @@ static int load_devices(struct devs *devices, char *devmap,
if (tst->ss->store_super(tst, dfd))
pr_err("Could not re-write superblock on %s.\n",
devname);
- close(dfd);
if (strcmp(c->update, "uuid")==0 &&
ident->bitmap_fd >= 0 && !bitmap_done) {
@@ -666,9 +665,9 @@ static int load_devices(struct devs *devices, char *devmap,
} else
#endif
{
- int dfd = dev_open(devname,
- tmpdev->disposition == 'I'
- ? O_RDWR : (O_RDWR|O_EXCL));
+ dfd = dev_open(devname,
+ tmpdev->disposition == 'I'
+ ? O_RDWR : (O_RDWR|O_EXCL));
tst = dup_super(st);
if (dfd < 0 || tst->ss->load_super(tst, dfd, NULL) != 0) {
@@ -685,10 +684,10 @@ static int load_devices(struct devs *devices, char *devmap,
return -1;
}
tst->ss->getinfo_super(tst, content, devmap + devcnt * content->array.raid_disks);
- close(dfd);
}
- stat(devname, &stb);
+ fstat(dfd, &stb);
+ close(dfd);
if (c->verbose > 0)
pr_err("%s is identified as a member of %s, slot %d%s.\n",
[-- Attachment #2: OpenPGP digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 811 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-02-24 21:12 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-02-24 21:00 [PATCH 0/5] Fix issues reported by covscan and newer GCC Jes.Sorensen
2015-02-24 21:00 ` [PATCH 1/5] Grow.c: Fix classic readlink() buffer overflow Jes.Sorensen
2015-02-24 21:00 ` [PATCH 2/5] Check return of stat() to avoid covscan complaining Jes.Sorensen
2015-02-24 21:12 ` NeilBrown [this message]
2015-02-24 21:56 ` Jes Sorensen
2015-02-24 22:03 ` NeilBrown
2015-02-25 0:13 ` Jes Sorensen
2015-02-24 21:00 ` [PATCH 3/5] add_orom(): Compare content of struct imsm_orom rather than pointers to it Jes.Sorensen
2015-02-25 10:51 ` Artur Paszkiewicz
2015-02-25 12:29 ` Jes Sorensen
2015-02-25 16:32 ` Artur Paszkiewicz
2015-02-25 17:15 ` Jes Sorensen
2015-02-27 13:39 ` Artur Paszkiewicz
2015-02-27 20:51 ` Jes Sorensen
2015-03-04 4:58 ` NeilBrown
2015-02-24 21:00 ` [PATCH 4/5] IncrementalScan(): Make sure 'st' is valid before dereferencing it Jes.Sorensen
2015-02-25 15:00 ` John Stoffel
2015-02-25 15:37 ` Jes Sorensen
2015-02-25 15:42 ` John Stoffel
2015-02-24 21:00 ` [PATCH 5/5] write_super_imsm_spares(): C statements are terminated by ; Jes.Sorensen
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20150225081243.1fe91420@notabene.brown \
--to=neilb@suse.de \
--cc=Jes.Sorensen@redhat.com \
--cc=artur.paszkiewicz@intel.com \
--cc=linux-raid@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).