From: NeilBrown <neilb-l3A5Bk7waGM@public.gmane.org>
To: linux-raid-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org,
Shaohua Li <shli-DgEjT+Ai2ygdnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org>
Cc: linux-nfs-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org
Subject: [PATCH 3/7] md/raid5: more incorrect BUG_ON in handle_stripe_fill.
Date: Fri, 08 May 2015 18:56:11 +1000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20150508085611.19179.1093.stgit@notabene.brown> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20150508085345.19179.8866.stgit-wvvUuzkyo1EYVZTmpyfIwg@public.gmane.org>
It is not incorrect to call handle_stripe_fill() when
a batch of full-stripe writes is active.
It is, however, a BUG if fetch_block() then decides
it needs to actually fetch anything.
So move the 'BUG_ON' to where it belongs.
Signed-off-by: NeilBrown <neilb-l3A5Bk7waGM@public.gmane.org>
Fixes: 59fc630b8b5f ("RAID5: batch adjacent full stripe write")
---
drivers/md/raid5.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/drivers/md/raid5.c b/drivers/md/raid5.c
index 91a1e8b26b52..415cac6d89bd 100644
--- a/drivers/md/raid5.c
+++ b/drivers/md/raid5.c
@@ -3302,6 +3302,7 @@ static int fetch_block(struct stripe_head *sh, struct stripe_head_state *s,
*/
BUG_ON(test_bit(R5_Wantcompute, &dev->flags));
BUG_ON(test_bit(R5_Wantread, &dev->flags));
+ BUG_ON(sh->batch_head);
if ((s->uptodate == disks - 1) &&
(s->failed && (disk_idx == s->failed_num[0] ||
disk_idx == s->failed_num[1]))) {
@@ -3370,7 +3371,6 @@ static void handle_stripe_fill(struct stripe_head *sh,
{
int i;
- BUG_ON(sh->batch_head);
/* look for blocks to read/compute, skip this if a compute
* is already in flight, or if the stripe contents are in the
* midst of changing due to a write
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-nfs" in
the body of a message to majordomo-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-05-08 8:56 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-05-08 8:56 [PATCH 0/7] md fixes for -rc2 NeilBrown
2015-05-08 8:56 ` [PATCH 1/7] md-raid0: conditional mddev->queue access to suit dm-raid NeilBrown
2015-05-08 8:56 ` [PATCH 5/7] md/raid5: don't record new size if resize_stripes fails NeilBrown
2015-05-08 8:56 ` [PATCH 2/7] md/raid5: new alloc_stripe() to allocate an initialize a stripe NeilBrown
2015-05-08 8:56 ` [PATCH 4/7] md/raid5: avoid reading parity blocks for full-stripe write to degraded array NeilBrown
2015-05-08 8:56 ` [PATCH 7/7] md/raid5: fix handling of degraded stripes in batches NeilBrown
2015-05-08 19:12 ` Shaohua Li
2015-05-13 0:56 ` NeilBrown
[not found] ` <20150513105604.55ac700a-wvvUuzkyo1EYVZTmpyfIwg@public.gmane.org>
2015-05-20 5:56 ` Shaohua Li
[not found] ` <20150508085345.19179.8866.stgit-wvvUuzkyo1EYVZTmpyfIwg@public.gmane.org>
2015-05-08 8:56 ` NeilBrown [this message]
2015-05-08 8:56 ` [PATCH 6/7] md/raid5: fix allocation of 'scribble' array NeilBrown
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20150508085611.19179.1093.stgit@notabene.brown \
--to=neilb-l3a5bk7wagm@public.gmane.org \
--cc=linux-nfs-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org \
--cc=linux-raid-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org \
--cc=shli-DgEjT+Ai2ygdnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).