linux-raid.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de>
To: Yuanhan Liu <yuanhan.liu@linux.intel.com>
Cc: linux-raid@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] md/raid5: avoid duplicate code
Date: Fri, 8 May 2015 15:28:00 +1000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20150508152800.18140bac@notabene.brown> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1430905550-6142-1-git-send-email-yuanhan.liu@linux.intel.com>

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 3699 bytes --]

On Wed,  6 May 2015 17:45:49 +0800 Yuanhan Liu <yuanhan.liu@linux.intel.com>
wrote:

> Move the code that put one idle sh(hot in cache, but happens to be
> zero referenced) back to active stage to __find_stripe(). Because
> that's what need to do every time you invoke __find_stripe().
> 
> Moving it there avoids duplicate code, as well as makes a bit more
> sense, IMO, as it tells a whole story now.

Thanks for this.  It is a good cleanup.

However I don't want to make any new changes to the RAID5 code until I find a
couple of bugs that I'm hunting.  So I won't apply it just yet.
Remind me in a couple of weeks if I seem to have forgotten.

Thanks,
NeilBrown


> 
> Signed-off-by: Yuanhan Liu <yuanhan.liu@linux.intel.com>
> ---
>  drivers/md/raid5.c | 50 ++++++++++++++++++--------------------------------
>  1 file changed, 18 insertions(+), 32 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/md/raid5.c b/drivers/md/raid5.c
> index 77dfd72..e7fa818 100644
> --- a/drivers/md/raid5.c
> +++ b/drivers/md/raid5.c
> @@ -567,8 +567,25 @@ static struct stripe_head *__find_stripe(struct r5conf *conf, sector_t sector,
>  
>  	pr_debug("__find_stripe, sector %llu\n", (unsigned long long)sector);
>  	hlist_for_each_entry(sh, stripe_hash(conf, sector), hash)
> -		if (sh->sector == sector && sh->generation == generation)
> +		if (sh->sector == sector && sh->generation == generation) {
> +			if (!atomic_inc_not_zero(&sh->count)) {
> +				spin_lock(&conf->device_lock);
> +				if (!atomic_read(&sh->count)) {
> +					if (!test_bit(STRIPE_HANDLE, &sh->state))
> +						atomic_inc(&conf->active_stripes);
> +					BUG_ON(list_empty(&sh->lru) &&
> +					       !test_bit(STRIPE_EXPANDING, &sh->state));
> +					list_del_init(&sh->lru);
> +					if (sh->group) {
> +						sh->group->stripes_cnt--;
> +						sh->group = NULL;
> +					}
> +				}
> +				atomic_inc(&sh->count);
> +				spin_unlock(&conf->device_lock);
> +			}
>  			return sh;
> +		}
>  	pr_debug("__stripe %llu not in cache\n", (unsigned long long)sector);
>  	return NULL;
>  }
> @@ -698,21 +715,6 @@ get_active_stripe(struct r5conf *conf, sector_t sector,
>  				init_stripe(sh, sector, previous);
>  				atomic_inc(&sh->count);
>  			}
> -		} else if (!atomic_inc_not_zero(&sh->count)) {
> -			spin_lock(&conf->device_lock);
> -			if (!atomic_read(&sh->count)) {
> -				if (!test_bit(STRIPE_HANDLE, &sh->state))
> -					atomic_inc(&conf->active_stripes);
> -				BUG_ON(list_empty(&sh->lru) &&
> -				       !test_bit(STRIPE_EXPANDING, &sh->state));
> -				list_del_init(&sh->lru);
> -				if (sh->group) {
> -					sh->group->stripes_cnt--;
> -					sh->group = NULL;
> -				}
> -			}
> -			atomic_inc(&sh->count);
> -			spin_unlock(&conf->device_lock);
>  		}
>  	} while (sh == NULL);
>  
> @@ -771,22 +773,6 @@ static void stripe_add_to_batch_list(struct r5conf *conf, struct stripe_head *sh
>  	hash = stripe_hash_locks_hash(head_sector);
>  	spin_lock_irq(conf->hash_locks + hash);
>  	head = __find_stripe(conf, head_sector, conf->generation);
> -	if (head && !atomic_inc_not_zero(&head->count)) {
> -		spin_lock(&conf->device_lock);
> -		if (!atomic_read(&head->count)) {
> -			if (!test_bit(STRIPE_HANDLE, &head->state))
> -				atomic_inc(&conf->active_stripes);
> -			BUG_ON(list_empty(&head->lru) &&
> -			       !test_bit(STRIPE_EXPANDING, &head->state));
> -			list_del_init(&head->lru);
> -			if (head->group) {
> -				head->group->stripes_cnt--;
> -				head->group = NULL;
> -			}
> -		}
> -		atomic_inc(&head->count);
> -		spin_unlock(&conf->device_lock);
> -	}
>  	spin_unlock_irq(conf->hash_locks + hash);
>  
>  	if (!head)


[-- Attachment #2: OpenPGP digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 811 bytes --]

  parent reply	other threads:[~2015-05-08  5:28 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2015-05-06  9:45 [PATCH 1/2] md/raid5: avoid duplicate code Yuanhan Liu
2015-05-06  9:45 ` [PATCH 2/2] md/raid5: remove unnecessary sh->count check Yuanhan Liu
2015-05-08  5:28 ` NeilBrown [this message]
2015-05-08  5:34   ` [PATCH 1/2] md/raid5: avoid duplicate code Yuanhan Liu

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20150508152800.18140bac@notabene.brown \
    --to=neilb@suse.de \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-raid@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=yuanhan.liu@linux.intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).