From: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de>
To: Yuanhan Liu <yuanhan.liu@linux.intel.com>
Cc: linux-raid@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] md/raid5: avoid duplicate code
Date: Fri, 8 May 2015 15:28:00 +1000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20150508152800.18140bac@notabene.brown> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1430905550-6142-1-git-send-email-yuanhan.liu@linux.intel.com>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 3699 bytes --]
On Wed, 6 May 2015 17:45:49 +0800 Yuanhan Liu <yuanhan.liu@linux.intel.com>
wrote:
> Move the code that put one idle sh(hot in cache, but happens to be
> zero referenced) back to active stage to __find_stripe(). Because
> that's what need to do every time you invoke __find_stripe().
>
> Moving it there avoids duplicate code, as well as makes a bit more
> sense, IMO, as it tells a whole story now.
Thanks for this. It is a good cleanup.
However I don't want to make any new changes to the RAID5 code until I find a
couple of bugs that I'm hunting. So I won't apply it just yet.
Remind me in a couple of weeks if I seem to have forgotten.
Thanks,
NeilBrown
>
> Signed-off-by: Yuanhan Liu <yuanhan.liu@linux.intel.com>
> ---
> drivers/md/raid5.c | 50 ++++++++++++++++++--------------------------------
> 1 file changed, 18 insertions(+), 32 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/md/raid5.c b/drivers/md/raid5.c
> index 77dfd72..e7fa818 100644
> --- a/drivers/md/raid5.c
> +++ b/drivers/md/raid5.c
> @@ -567,8 +567,25 @@ static struct stripe_head *__find_stripe(struct r5conf *conf, sector_t sector,
>
> pr_debug("__find_stripe, sector %llu\n", (unsigned long long)sector);
> hlist_for_each_entry(sh, stripe_hash(conf, sector), hash)
> - if (sh->sector == sector && sh->generation == generation)
> + if (sh->sector == sector && sh->generation == generation) {
> + if (!atomic_inc_not_zero(&sh->count)) {
> + spin_lock(&conf->device_lock);
> + if (!atomic_read(&sh->count)) {
> + if (!test_bit(STRIPE_HANDLE, &sh->state))
> + atomic_inc(&conf->active_stripes);
> + BUG_ON(list_empty(&sh->lru) &&
> + !test_bit(STRIPE_EXPANDING, &sh->state));
> + list_del_init(&sh->lru);
> + if (sh->group) {
> + sh->group->stripes_cnt--;
> + sh->group = NULL;
> + }
> + }
> + atomic_inc(&sh->count);
> + spin_unlock(&conf->device_lock);
> + }
> return sh;
> + }
> pr_debug("__stripe %llu not in cache\n", (unsigned long long)sector);
> return NULL;
> }
> @@ -698,21 +715,6 @@ get_active_stripe(struct r5conf *conf, sector_t sector,
> init_stripe(sh, sector, previous);
> atomic_inc(&sh->count);
> }
> - } else if (!atomic_inc_not_zero(&sh->count)) {
> - spin_lock(&conf->device_lock);
> - if (!atomic_read(&sh->count)) {
> - if (!test_bit(STRIPE_HANDLE, &sh->state))
> - atomic_inc(&conf->active_stripes);
> - BUG_ON(list_empty(&sh->lru) &&
> - !test_bit(STRIPE_EXPANDING, &sh->state));
> - list_del_init(&sh->lru);
> - if (sh->group) {
> - sh->group->stripes_cnt--;
> - sh->group = NULL;
> - }
> - }
> - atomic_inc(&sh->count);
> - spin_unlock(&conf->device_lock);
> }
> } while (sh == NULL);
>
> @@ -771,22 +773,6 @@ static void stripe_add_to_batch_list(struct r5conf *conf, struct stripe_head *sh
> hash = stripe_hash_locks_hash(head_sector);
> spin_lock_irq(conf->hash_locks + hash);
> head = __find_stripe(conf, head_sector, conf->generation);
> - if (head && !atomic_inc_not_zero(&head->count)) {
> - spin_lock(&conf->device_lock);
> - if (!atomic_read(&head->count)) {
> - if (!test_bit(STRIPE_HANDLE, &head->state))
> - atomic_inc(&conf->active_stripes);
> - BUG_ON(list_empty(&head->lru) &&
> - !test_bit(STRIPE_EXPANDING, &head->state));
> - list_del_init(&head->lru);
> - if (head->group) {
> - head->group->stripes_cnt--;
> - head->group = NULL;
> - }
> - }
> - atomic_inc(&head->count);
> - spin_unlock(&conf->device_lock);
> - }
> spin_unlock_irq(conf->hash_locks + hash);
>
> if (!head)
[-- Attachment #2: OpenPGP digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 811 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-05-08 5:28 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-05-06 9:45 [PATCH 1/2] md/raid5: avoid duplicate code Yuanhan Liu
2015-05-06 9:45 ` [PATCH 2/2] md/raid5: remove unnecessary sh->count check Yuanhan Liu
2015-05-08 5:28 ` NeilBrown [this message]
2015-05-08 5:34 ` [PATCH 1/2] md/raid5: avoid duplicate code Yuanhan Liu
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20150508152800.18140bac@notabene.brown \
--to=neilb@suse.de \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-raid@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=yuanhan.liu@linux.intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).