linux-raid.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de>
To: Shaohua Li <shli@kernel.org>
Cc: linux-raid@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH 2/8] md/raid5: Ensure a batch member is not handled prematurely.
Date: Fri, 22 May 2015 15:30:58 +1000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20150522053058.2117.29026.stgit@notabene.brown> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20150522052802.2117.40527.stgit@notabene.brown>

If a stripe is a member of a batch, but not the head, it must
not be handled separately from the rest of the batch.

'clear_batch_ready()' handles this requirement to some
extent but not completely.  If a member is passed to handle_stripe()
a second time it returns '0' indicating the stripe can be handled,
which is wrong.
So add an extra test.

Signed-off-by: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de>
---
 drivers/md/raid5.c |    6 +++++-
 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/drivers/md/raid5.c b/drivers/md/raid5.c
index c3ccefbd4fe7..9a803b735848 100644
--- a/drivers/md/raid5.c
+++ b/drivers/md/raid5.c
@@ -4192,9 +4192,13 @@ static void analyse_stripe(struct stripe_head *sh, struct stripe_head_state *s)
 
 static int clear_batch_ready(struct stripe_head *sh)
 {
+	/* Return '1' if this is a member of batch, or
+	 * '0' if it is a lone stripe or a head which can now be
+	 * handled.
+	 */
 	struct stripe_head *tmp;
 	if (!test_and_clear_bit(STRIPE_BATCH_READY, &sh->state))
-		return 0;
+		return (sh->batch_head && sh->batch_head != sh);
 	spin_lock(&sh->stripe_lock);
 	if (!sh->batch_head) {
 		spin_unlock(&sh->stripe_lock);



  parent reply	other threads:[~2015-05-22  5:30 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2015-05-22  5:30 [PATCH 0/8] Fixes for md/raid5 stripe batching code NeilBrown
2015-05-22  5:30 ` [PATCH 7/8] md/raid5: call break_stripe_batch_list from handle_stripe_clean_event NeilBrown
2015-05-22  5:30 ` [PATCH 4/8] md/raid5: duplicate some more handle_stripe_clean_event code in break_stripe_batch_list NeilBrown
2015-05-22  5:30 ` [PATCH 5/8] md/raid5: add handle_flags arg to break_stripe_batch_list NeilBrown
2015-05-22  5:30 ` [PATCH 8/8] md/raid5: break stripe-batches when the array has failed NeilBrown
2015-05-22  5:30 ` [PATCH 3/8] md/raid5: remove condition test from check_break_stripe_batch_list NeilBrown
2015-05-22  5:30 ` NeilBrown [this message]
2015-05-22 23:44   ` [PATCH 2/8] md/raid5: Ensure a batch member is not handled prematurely Shaohua Li
2015-05-23  0:26     ` NeilBrown
2015-05-26 18:16       ` Shaohua Li
2015-05-26 22:35         ` NeilBrown
2015-05-26 23:21           ` Shaohua Li
2015-05-26 23:34           ` NeilBrown
2015-05-27  0:10             ` Shaohua Li
2015-05-27  0:36               ` NeilBrown
2015-05-22  5:30 ` [PATCH 6/8] md/raid5: be more selective about distributing flags across batch NeilBrown
2015-05-22  5:30 ` [PATCH 1/8] md/raid5: ensure whole batch is delayed for all required bitmap updates NeilBrown

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20150522053058.2117.29026.stgit@notabene.brown \
    --to=neilb@suse.de \
    --cc=linux-raid@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=shli@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).