From: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de>
To: Shaohua Li <shli@kernel.org>
Cc: linux-raid@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/8] md/raid5: Ensure a batch member is not handled prematurely.
Date: Wed, 27 May 2015 09:34:51 +1000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20150527093451.0c83be44@notabene.brown> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20150527083532.32486e08@notabene.brown>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 3272 bytes --]
On Wed, 27 May 2015 08:35:32 +1000 NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de> wrote:
> Could you please review and possibly test the patch below?
>
well... that patch had a fairly obvious double-lock bug.
Try this one.
(oh, just saw your email that you spotted the lock bug :-)
NeilBrown
From: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de>
Date: Wed, 27 May 2015 08:43:45 +1000
Subject: [PATCH] md/raid5: close race between STRIPE_BIT_DELAY and batching.
The first time a write is added to a stripe, we need to set the
bitmap bits (if a bitmap is active).
While doing that the stripe is not locked and other writes could
be added and then the stripe could be added to a batch.
Once it has entered the batch it is too large to set STRIPE_BIT_DELAY
as the batch head has taken over when the stripe will be written.
We cannot hold the spinlock while adding the bitmap bit,
so introduce a new stripe_head flag 'STRIPE_BITMAP_PENDING' which
indicates that adding to the bitmap is pending. This prevents
the stripe from being added to a batch.
Only the first thread to add a write to a stripe can set this bit,
so it is safe for it to clear it again when it is done.
Reported-by: Shaohua Li <shli@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de>
diff --git a/drivers/md/raid5.c b/drivers/md/raid5.c
index 73b5376dad3b..dae587ecdf71 100644
--- a/drivers/md/raid5.c
+++ b/drivers/md/raid5.c
@@ -760,6 +760,7 @@ static void unlock_two_stripes(struct stripe_head *sh1, struct stripe_head *sh2)
static bool stripe_can_batch(struct stripe_head *sh)
{
return test_bit(STRIPE_BATCH_READY, &sh->state) &&
+ !test_bit(STRIPE_BITMAP_PENDING, &sh->state) &&
is_full_stripe_write(sh);
}
@@ -3007,14 +3008,27 @@ static int add_stripe_bio(struct stripe_head *sh, struct bio *bi, int dd_idx,
pr_debug("added bi b#%llu to stripe s#%llu, disk %d.\n",
(unsigned long long)(*bip)->bi_iter.bi_sector,
(unsigned long long)sh->sector, dd_idx);
- spin_unlock_irq(&sh->stripe_lock);
if (conf->mddev->bitmap && firstwrite) {
+ /* Cannot hold spinlock over bitmap_startwrite,
+ * but must ensure this isn't added to a batch until
+ * we have added to the bitmap and set bm_seq.
+ * So set STRIPE_BITMAP_PENDING to prevent
+ * batching.
+ * Only the first thread to add a write to a stripe
+ * can set this bit, so we "own" it.
+ */
+ WARN_ON(test_bit(STRIPE_BITMAP_PENDING, &sh->state));
+ set_bit(STRIPE_BITMAP_PENDING, &sh->state);
+ spin_unlock_irq(&sh->stripe_lock);
bitmap_startwrite(conf->mddev->bitmap, sh->sector,
STRIPE_SECTORS, 0);
+ spin_lock_irq(&sh->stripe_lock);
+ clear_bit(STRIPE_BITMAP_PENDING, &sh->state);
sh->bm_seq = conf->seq_flush+1;
set_bit(STRIPE_BIT_DELAY, &sh->state);
}
+ spin_unlock_irq(&sh->stripe_lock);
if (stripe_can_batch(sh))
stripe_add_to_batch_list(conf, sh);
diff --git a/drivers/md/raid5.h b/drivers/md/raid5.h
index d7b2bc8b756f..02c3bf8fbfe7 100644
--- a/drivers/md/raid5.h
+++ b/drivers/md/raid5.h
@@ -337,6 +337,9 @@ enum {
STRIPE_ON_RELEASE_LIST,
STRIPE_BATCH_READY,
STRIPE_BATCH_ERR,
+ STRIPE_BITMAP_PENDING, /* Being added to bitmap, don't add
+ * to batch yet.
+ */
};
#define STRIPE_EXPAND_SYNC_FLAGS \
[-- Attachment #2: OpenPGP digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 811 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-05-26 23:34 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-05-22 5:30 [PATCH 0/8] Fixes for md/raid5 stripe batching code NeilBrown
2015-05-22 5:30 ` [PATCH 7/8] md/raid5: call break_stripe_batch_list from handle_stripe_clean_event NeilBrown
2015-05-22 5:30 ` [PATCH 4/8] md/raid5: duplicate some more handle_stripe_clean_event code in break_stripe_batch_list NeilBrown
2015-05-22 5:30 ` [PATCH 5/8] md/raid5: add handle_flags arg to break_stripe_batch_list NeilBrown
2015-05-22 5:30 ` [PATCH 3/8] md/raid5: remove condition test from check_break_stripe_batch_list NeilBrown
2015-05-22 5:30 ` [PATCH 2/8] md/raid5: Ensure a batch member is not handled prematurely NeilBrown
2015-05-22 23:44 ` Shaohua Li
2015-05-23 0:26 ` NeilBrown
2015-05-26 18:16 ` Shaohua Li
2015-05-26 22:35 ` NeilBrown
2015-05-26 23:21 ` Shaohua Li
2015-05-26 23:34 ` NeilBrown [this message]
2015-05-27 0:10 ` Shaohua Li
2015-05-27 0:36 ` NeilBrown
2015-05-22 5:30 ` [PATCH 8/8] md/raid5: break stripe-batches when the array has failed NeilBrown
2015-05-22 5:30 ` [PATCH 1/8] md/raid5: ensure whole batch is delayed for all required bitmap updates NeilBrown
2015-05-22 5:30 ` [PATCH 6/8] md/raid5: be more selective about distributing flags across batch NeilBrown
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20150527093451.0c83be44@notabene.brown \
--to=neilb@suse.de \
--cc=linux-raid@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=shli@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).