From: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de>
To: Shaohua Li <shli@fb.com>
Cc: linux-raid@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/4] raid5: wakeup raid5d when R5_ALLOC_MORE is set
Date: Fri, 29 May 2015 15:02:56 +1000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20150529150256.6ca4211f@notabene.brown> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <a92a0c36813c740c5de65a95b75ef161c1f2ede1.1432859513.git.shli@fb.com>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1433 bytes --]
On Thu, 28 May 2015 17:33:45 -0700 Shaohua Li <shli@fb.com> wrote:
> The run time stripe allocation is done at raid5d. When we set the
> R5_ALLOC_MORE flag, we should notify raid5d to handle it
>
> Signed-off-by: Shaohua Li <shli@fb.com>
> ---
> drivers/md/raid5.c | 4 +++-
> 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/md/raid5.c b/drivers/md/raid5.c
> index 61e8e04..bfa2042 100644
> --- a/drivers/md/raid5.c
> +++ b/drivers/md/raid5.c
> @@ -674,9 +674,11 @@ get_active_stripe(struct r5conf *conf, sector_t sector,
> if (!test_bit(R5_INACTIVE_BLOCKED, &conf->cache_state)) {
> sh = get_free_stripe(conf, hash);
> if (!sh && llist_empty(&conf->released_stripes) &&
> - !test_bit(R5_DID_ALLOC, &conf->cache_state))
> + !test_bit(R5_DID_ALLOC, &conf->cache_state)) {
> set_bit(R5_ALLOC_MORE,
> &conf->cache_state);
> + md_wakeup_thread(conf->mddev->thread);
> + }
> }
> if (noblock && sh == NULL)
> break;
Thanks for reviewing my code !!!
I'm not exactly against this patch, but I wonder if it is really needed.
R5_ALLOC_MORE is really just a hint - "You can allocate another stripe if you
like". If the array is at all busy, raid5d will be called fairly often and
the allocation will happen. If the array is idle, it doesn't matter if
memory is allocated for a while. Does it?
Thanks,
NeilBrown
[-- Attachment #2: OpenPGP digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 811 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-05-29 5:02 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-05-29 0:33 [PATCH 1/4] raid5: wakeup raid5d when R5_ALLOC_MORE is set Shaohua Li
2015-05-29 0:33 ` [PATCH 2/4] raid5: grown at least NR_STRIPE_HASH_LOCKS stripes Shaohua Li
2015-05-29 5:07 ` NeilBrown
2015-05-29 0:33 ` [PATCH 3/4] raid5: ignore released_stripes check Shaohua Li
2015-05-29 5:16 ` NeilBrown
2015-05-29 0:33 ` [PATCH 4/4] raid5: fix wakeup condition Shaohua Li
2015-05-29 5:23 ` NeilBrown
2015-05-29 5:42 ` Shaohua Li
2015-05-29 5:42 ` Yuanhan Liu
2015-05-29 5:02 ` NeilBrown [this message]
2015-05-29 5:33 ` [PATCH 1/4] raid5: wakeup raid5d when R5_ALLOC_MORE is set Shaohua Li
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20150529150256.6ca4211f@notabene.brown \
--to=neilb@suse.de \
--cc=linux-raid@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=shli@fb.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).