From: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.com>
To: Piergiorgio Sartor <piergiorgio.sartor@nexgo.de>
Cc: linux-raid <linux-raid@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: Subject: ANNOUNCE: mdadm 3.3.3 - A tool for managing md Soft RAID under Linux
Date: Fri, 31 Jul 2015 09:34:04 +1000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20150731093404.28e7df7e@noble> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20150727162906.GA3051@lazy.lzy>
On Mon, 27 Jul 2015 18:29:06 +0200 Piergiorgio Sartor
<piergiorgio.sartor@nexgo.de> wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 24, 2015 at 04:35:30PM +1000, NeilBrown wrote:
> >
> >
> > I am pleased to announce the availability of
> > mdadm version 3.3.3
> >
> > It is available at the usual places:
> > http://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/utils/raid/mdadm/
> > and via git at
> > git://github.com/neilbrown/mdadm
> > git://neil.brown.name/mdadm
> > http://git.neil.brown.name/git/mdadm.git
> >
> > The 100 changes since 3.3.3 are mostly little bugfixes and some improvements
> > to the selftests.
> > raid6check now handle all RAID6 layouts including DDF correctly.
> > See git log for the rest.
> >
> > NeilBrown 24th July 2015
>
> Hi Neil,
>
> I would like to thank you for clean up and improving
> "raid6check.c".
> I personally appreciate your contribution very much,
> and I think it is good to have your expert eye
> looking at the code.
>
> Thanks again for your time,
>
> bye,
>
Happy to help, but I should confess that the motivation was purely
selfish.
I was doing some testing and the 01raid6integ test (which fails
different devices in a RAID6 and checks the data is still correct) was
occasionally reporting errors - a bit of a worry.
It eventually turned out to be a hardware issue - I was running in VMs
and after power-cycling my workstation the problem doesn't appear any
more.
But before I got to the stage I wanted to get a clearer idea of what
sort of corruption was happening, so I added a call to raid6check to
the test and it reported really strange results for some layouts.
So in order to get the data I needed, I fixed the code to work properly
for all layout. i.e. write a test script to test all layouts, then fix
things until the script stopped complaining :-)
So despite that fact that it didn't actually lead me to the cause:
thank you for providing the program in the first place :-)
Thanks,
NeilBrown
prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-07-30 23:34 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-07-24 6:35 Subject: ANNOUNCE: mdadm 3.3.3 - A tool for managing md Soft RAID under Linux NeilBrown
2015-07-27 16:29 ` Piergiorgio Sartor
2015-07-30 23:34 ` NeilBrown [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20150731093404.28e7df7e@noble \
--to=neilb@suse.com \
--cc=linux-raid@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=piergiorgio.sartor@nexgo.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).