From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
Subject: Re: raid5-cache I/O path improvements
Date: Tue, 8 Sep 2015 13:02:26 -0400
Message-ID: <20150908170226.GI13749@mtj.duckdns.org>
References: <1441603250-5119-1-git-send-email-hch@lst.de>
 <20150908002840.GA3196542@devbig257.prn2.facebook.com>
 <20150908061215.GA23833@lst.de>
 <20150908165611.GA371379@devbig257.prn2.facebook.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Return-path: <linux-ide-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20150908165611.GA371379@devbig257.prn2.facebook.com>
Sender: linux-ide-owner@vger.kernel.org
To: Shaohua Li <shli@fb.com>
Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>, neilb@suse.de, linux-raid@vger.kernel.org, Kernel-team@fb.com, dan.j.williams@intel.com, "Martin K. Petersen" <martin.petersen@oracle.com>, linux-ide@vger.kernel.org
List-Id: linux-raid.ids

Hello,

On Tue, Sep 08, 2015 at 09:56:22AM -0700, Shaohua Li wrote:
> I'll benchmark on a SSD from another vendor, which supports FUA, but FUA
> write has poor performance in my last test.

lolwut?  Was it slower than write + flush?

thanks.

-- 
tejun