From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Christoph Hellwig Subject: Re: [dm-devel] [PATCH 0/2] Introduce the request handling for dm-crypt Date: Thu, 12 Nov 2015 01:05:40 -0800 Message-ID: <20151112090540.GA18886@infradead.org> References: <20151111181813.GD12236@redhat.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20151111181813.GD12236@redhat.com> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org To: device-mapper development Cc: Baolin Wang , axboe@kernel.dk, keith.busch@intel.com, jack@suse.cz, arnd@arndb.de, neilb@suse.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-raid@vger.kernel.org, broonie@kernel.org, dineshg@quicinc.com, tj@kernel.org, bart.vanassche@sandisk.com, jmoyer@redhat.com, agk@redhat.com List-Id: linux-raid.ids On Wed, Nov 11, 2015 at 01:18:13PM -0500, Mike Snitzer wrote: > But I'm trying to keep an open mind... show me data that real hardware > _really_ benefits and we'll go from there. Again, it needs to be "OMG, > this is amazing!" level performance to warrant any further serious > consideration. Also the numbers should be on 4.3+ with our arbitrarily sizeds bios, and a file system that isn't stupid and actually submits bios (xfs, btrfs for example).