linux-raid.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Roman Mamedov <rm@romanrm.net>
To: Dallas Clement <dallas.a.clement@gmail.com>
Cc: linux-raid@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: RAID 5,6 sequential writing seems slower in newer kernels
Date: Wed, 2 Dec 2015 10:22:37 +0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20151202102237.2adb17d4@natsu> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAE9DZURyZKmnUmnn5ELAhLUq8nhXD1eBx4g8hDmCzS-MYLrT+Q@mail.gmail.com>

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 522 bytes --]

On Tue, 1 Dec 2015 17:02:27 -0600
Dallas Clement <dallas.a.clement@gmail.com> wrote:

> I am frankly surprised at these results.  Perhaps there is some
> configuration or tunable settings that have changed since the 2.6
> kernel that I am unaware of that affect RAID 5, 6 performance.  Please
> comment if you have any ideas which might explain what I am seeing.

Do you use a write intent bitmap (internal?), what is your bitmap chunk size?

What is your stripe_cache_size set to?

-- 
With respect,
Roman

[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 198 bytes --]

  parent reply	other threads:[~2015-12-02  5:22 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 35+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2015-12-01 23:02 RAID 5,6 sequential writing seems slower in newer kernels Dallas Clement
2015-12-02  1:07 ` keld
2015-12-02 14:18   ` Robert Kierski
2015-12-02 14:45     ` Phil Turmel
2015-12-02 15:28       ` Robert Kierski
2015-12-02 15:37         ` Phil Turmel
2015-12-02 15:44           ` Robert Kierski
2015-12-02 15:51             ` Phil Turmel
2015-12-02 19:50               ` Dallas Clement
2015-12-03  0:12                 ` Dallas Clement
2015-12-03  2:18                   ` Phil Turmel
2015-12-03  2:24                     ` Dallas Clement
2015-12-03  2:33                       ` Dallas Clement
2015-12-03  2:38                         ` Phil Turmel
2015-12-03  2:51                           ` Dallas Clement
2015-12-03  4:30                             ` Phil Turmel
2015-12-03  4:49                               ` Dallas Clement
2015-12-03 13:43                               ` Robert Kierski
2015-12-03 14:37                                 ` Phil Turmel
2015-12-03  2:34                       ` Phil Turmel
2015-12-03 14:19                 ` Robert Kierski
2015-12-03 14:39                   ` Dallas Clement
2015-12-03 15:04                   ` Phil Turmel
2015-12-03 22:21                     ` Weedy
2015-12-04 13:40                     ` Robert Kierski
2015-12-04 16:08                       ` Dallas Clement
2015-12-07 14:29                         ` Robert Kierski
2015-12-08 19:38                           ` Dallas Clement
2015-12-08 21:24                             ` Robert Kierski
2015-12-04 18:51                       ` Shaohua Li
2015-12-05  1:38                         ` Dallas Clement
2015-12-07 14:18                         ` Robert Kierski
2015-12-02 15:37       ` Robert Kierski
2015-12-02  5:22 ` Roman Mamedov [this message]
2015-12-02 14:15 ` Robert Kierski

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20151202102237.2adb17d4@natsu \
    --to=rm@romanrm.net \
    --cc=dallas.a.clement@gmail.com \
    --cc=linux-raid@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).