From: "Étienne Buira" <etienne.buira@gmail.com>
To: linux-raid@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Probable bug in md with rdev->new_data_offset
Date: Mon, 28 Mar 2016 12:31:24 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20160328103123.GC8633@rcKGHUlyQfVFW> (raw)
Hi all,
Please apologise if i hit the wrong list.
I searched a bit, but could not find bug report or commits that seemed
related, please apologise if i'm wrong here.
I was going to grow a raid6 array (that contained a spare), using this
command:
# mdadm --grow -n 7 /dev/mdx
But when doing so, i got a PAX message saying that a size overflow was
detected in super_1_sync on the decl new_offset. The array was then in
unusable state (presumably because some locks were held).
After printking the values for rdev->new_data_offset and
rdev->data_offset in the
if (rdev->new_data_offset != rdev->data_offset) { ...
block of super_1_sync, i found that new_data_offset (252928 in my case)
where smaller than data_offset (258048), thus, the substraction to
compute sb->new_data_offset yielded an insanely high value.
For all partitions this array is made of, mdadm -E /dev/sdxy reports a
data offset of 258048 sectors (the value of rdev->data_offset).
IMHO, it seems a good idea to put a BUG_ON or similar if
rdev->new_data_offset is smaller than rdev->data offset at this place,
but that would not address the real issue.
I could solve my problem by setting mdadm's backup-file= option.
Kernel version was Gentoo hardened v4.4.2.
Full PAX size overflow detection line:
size overflow detected in function super_1_sync drivers/md/md.c:1683
cicus.1522_314 min, count: 158, decl: new_offset; num: 0; context:
mdp_superblock_1
Call stack (without addresses):
dump_stack
report_size_overflow
super_1_sync
? sched_clock_cpu
md_update_sb
? account_entity_dequeue
? dequeue_task_fair
? mutex_lock
? bitmap_daemon_work
md_check_recovery
raid5d
? try_to_del_timer_sync
? del_timer_sync
md_thread
? wait_woken
? find_pers
kthread
? kthread_create_on_node
ret_from_fork
? kthread_create_on_node
I am not familiar with kernel coding, so i won't create a patch, but i'm
willing to give more information if needed to track this issue.
Regards.
next reply other threads:[~2016-03-28 10:31 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-03-28 10:31 Étienne Buira [this message]
2016-03-28 12:19 ` Probable bug in md with rdev->new_data_offset Phil Turmel
2016-03-29 11:07 ` Étienne Buira
2016-04-01 5:31 ` NeilBrown
2016-04-01 6:15 ` Étienne Buira
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20160328103123.GC8633@rcKGHUlyQfVFW \
--to=etienne.buira@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-raid@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).