* Poor written performance with RAID5 on ARM64
@ 2016-04-18 5:43 刘正元
2016-04-19 13:59 ` Shaohua Li
0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: 刘正元 @ 2016-04-18 5:43 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-raid
Hi,everyone.
I upgrade kernel form 3.14.x to 4.4.x recently on my ARM64 server. I create a RAID5 device with 8 disks on the server and have a dd test which like this "dd if=/dev/zero of=/dev/md5 bs=64K count=400000". Before upgrade it can reach 700M/s written and only 500M/s after upgrade. Then I disable the bitmap which means "mdadm create --bitmap=none", the speed can reach 800M/s with 4.4 kernel. I have a fast view on driver/md/bitmap.c and got no answer. I doubt X86 platform has the same question. So, what is the most difference between 3.14.x and 4.4.x about md driver. Where could I found the ChangeLog or commit about the driver. Any answer would be thankful.
Best wish to you.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* Re: Poor written performance with RAID5 on ARM64
2016-04-18 5:43 Poor written performance with RAID5 on ARM64 刘正元
@ 2016-04-19 13:59 ` Shaohua Li
0 siblings, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Shaohua Li @ 2016-04-19 13:59 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: 刘正元; +Cc: linux-raid
On Mon, Apr 18, 2016 at 01:43:04PM +0800, 刘正元 wrote:
> Hi,everyone. I upgrade kernel form 3.14.x to 4.4.x recently on my ARM64
> server. I create a RAID5 device with 8 disks on the server and have a dd
> test which like this "dd if=/dev/zero of=/dev/md5 bs=64K count=400000".
> Before upgrade it can reach 700M/s written and only 500M/s after upgrade.
> Then I disable the bitmap which means "mdadm create --bitmap=none", the speed
> can reach 800M/s with 4.4 kernel. I have a fast view on driver/md/bitmap.c
> and got no answer. I doubt X86 platform has the same question. So, what is
> the most difference between 3.14.x and 4.4.x about md driver. Where could I
> found the ChangeLog or commit about the driver. Any answer would be thankful.
did you observe any changes in iostat? Could you post blktrace from one of the
raid disk?
Thanks,
Shaohua
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-raid" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* Re: Poor written performance with RAID5 on ARM64
@ 2016-04-20 4:16 刘正元
0 siblings, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: 刘正元 @ 2016-04-20 4:16 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-raid
Thanks for reply.
I have traced the iostat changes under the both kernel version as below show. As you can see, disk IO is not the bottleneck because bandwidth not reach 100%, and cpu for single core hold about 40% during testing.
----------------------------------------------for kernel 3.14.64----------------------------------------------------------------------
avg-cpu: %user %nice %system %iowait %steal %idle
0.00 0.00 3.65 6.25 0.00 90.10
Device: rrqm/s wrqm/s r/s w/s rkB/s wkB/s avgrq-sz avgqu-sz await r_await w_await svctm %util
sda 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
sdb 0.00 1549.01 0.00 220.30 0.00 112033.91 1017.12 14.23 63.48 0.00 63.48 4.11 90.59
sdc 0.00 1549.01 0.00 222.77 0.00 113301.24 1017.19 10.95 48.76 0.00 48.76 4.02 89.60
sdd 0.00 1549.01 0.00 222.28 0.00 113047.77 1017.18 16.18 72.32 0.00 72.32 4.16 92.57
sdf 0.00 1549.01 0.00 216.34 0.00 110006.19 1016.99 14.61 65.01 0.00 65.01 4.28 92.57
sde 0.00 1549.01 0.00 222.28 0.00 113047.77 1017.18 12.37 55.21 0.00 55.21 3.99 88.61
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
--------------------------------------------------------for kernel 4.4.3--------------------------------------------------------------
avg-cpu: %user %nice %system %iowait %steal %idle
0.03 0.00 2.37 5.43 0.00 92.18
Device: rrqm/s wrqm/s r/s w/s rkB/s wkB/s avgrq-sz avgqu-sz await r_await w_await svctm %util
sdb 30.00 1209.50 1.50 70.00 1056.00 85441.50 2419.51 19.62 331.41 114.67 336.06 9.68 69.20
sdc 30.00 1209.50 1.50 69.00 1056.00 84161.50 2417.52 18.02 303.06 120.00 307.04 9.28 65.40
sdd 30.50 1211.00 1.50 70.00 1088.00 85505.50 2422.20 20.88 351.13 142.67 355.60 10.13 72.40
sde 30.50 1210.50 1.50 69.50 1088.00 84866.25 2421.25 18.53 311.77 117.33 315.97 9.55 67.80
sdf 0.00 1224.50 0.00 72.00 0.00 86850.25 2412.51 21.38 353.64 0.00 353.64 10.75 77.40
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
While disable bitmap the field %util could reach 100% and written speed of single disk could reach 120M/s under kernel 4.4.3. So, I doubt bitmap may be the mather.
Best wishs (祝生活愉快)!
------------------ Original ------------------
From: "Shaohua Li";
Date: 2016年4月19日(星期二) 晚上9:59
To: "刘正元";
Cc: "linux-raid";
Subject: Re: Poor written performance with RAID5 on ARM64
On Mon, Apr 18, 2016 at 01:43:04PM +0800, 刘正元 wrote:
> Hi,everyone. I upgrade kernel form 3.14.x to 4.4.x recently on my ARM64
> server. I create a RAID5 device with 8 disks on the server and have a dd
> test which like this "dd if=/dev/zero of=/dev/md5 bs=64K count=400000".
> Before upgrade it can reach 700M/s written and only 500M/s after upgrade.
> Then I disable the bitmap which means "mdadm create --bitmap=none", the speed
> can reach 800M/s with 4.4 kernel. I have a fast view on driver/md/bitmap.c
> and got no answer. I doubt X86 platform has the same question. So, what is
> the most difference between 3.14.x and 4.4.x about md driver. Where could I
> found the ChangeLog or commit about the driver. Any answer would be thankful.
did you observe any changes in iostat? Could you post blktrace from one of the
raid disk?
Thanks,
Shaohua
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2016-04-20 4:16 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2016-04-18 5:43 Poor written performance with RAID5 on ARM64 刘正元
2016-04-19 13:59 ` Shaohua Li
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2016-04-20 4:16 刘正元
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).