From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Shaohua Li Subject: Re: [PATCH] Need update superblock on time when deciding to do reshape Date: Fri, 20 May 2016 10:59:46 -0700 Message-ID: <20160520175946.GA76216@kernel.org> References: <1463475249-18658-1-git-send-email-xni@redhat.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1463475249-18658-1-git-send-email-xni@redhat.com> Sender: linux-raid-owner@vger.kernel.org To: Xiao Ni Cc: linux-raid@vger.kernel.org, Jes.Sorensen@redhat.com List-Id: linux-raid.ids On Tue, May 17, 2016 at 04:54:09PM +0800, Xiao Ni wrote: > Hi all > > If the disks are not enough to have spaces for relocating the data_offset, > it needs to run start_reshape and then run mdadm --grow --continue by > systemd. But mdadm --grow --continue fails because it checkes that > info->reshape_active is 0. > > The info->reshape_active is set to 1 when the superblock feature_map > have the flag MD_FEATURE_RESHAPE_ACTIVE. Superblock feature_map is set > MD_FEATURE_RESHAPE_ACTIVE as mddev->reshape_position != MaxSector. > > Function start_reshape calls raid5_start_reshape which changes > mddev->reshape_position to 0. Then in md_check_recovery it updates the > superblock to underlying devices. But there is a chance that the superblock > haven't written to underlying devices, the mdadm reads the superblock data. > So mdadm --grow --continue fails. > > The steps to reproduce this: > mdadm -CR /dev/md0 -l5 -n3 /dev/loop[0-2] --bitmap=internal > mdadm --wait /dev/md0 > mdadm /dev/md0 -a /dev/loop3 > mdadm --grow --raid-devices 4 /dev/md0 > The loop device size is 500MB > > [root@storageqe-09 ~]# cat /proc/mdstat > Personalities : [raid6] [raid5] [raid4] > md0 : active raid5 loop3[4] loop2[3] loop1[1] loop0[0] > 1021952 blocks super 1.2 level 5, 512k chunk, algorithm 2 [4/4] [UUUU] > [>....................] reshape = 0.0% (1/510976) finish=0.0min speed=255488K/sec > bitmap: 1/1 pages [4KB], 65536KB chunk what's the bad effect of the --continue failure? I think reshape will still continue. Doing a update super there is ok, but I'm wondering if it's the good way. Could mdadm wait for MD_FEATURE_RESHAPE_ACTIVE then let systemd run? Because sounds like we are working around systemd bug, kernel itself will write superblock anyway soon, so we probably working around in userspace. > unused devices: > > So if we update the superblock on time, mdadm can read the right superblock data. > > Signed-off-by > > --- > drivers/md/md.c | 1 + > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+) > > diff --git a/drivers/md/md.c b/drivers/md/md.c > index 14d3b37..7919606 100644 > --- a/drivers/md/md.c > +++ b/drivers/md/md.c > @@ -4350,6 +4350,7 @@ action_store(struct mddev *mddev, const char *page, size_t len) > else { > clear_bit(MD_RECOVERY_FROZEN, &mddev->recovery); > err = mddev->pers->start_reshape(mddev); > + md_update_sb(mddev, 1); write super even err != 0? Thanks, Shaohua