From: Roman Mamedov <rm@romanrm.net>
To: Marc MERLIN <marc@merlins.org>
Cc: "linux-raid@vger.kernel.org" <linux-raid@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: Raid check didn't fix Current_Pending_Sector, but badblocks -nsv did
Date: Tue, 7 Jun 2016 10:35:31 +0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20160607103531.561755d2@natsu> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20160606174113.GI12382@merlins.org>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1042 bytes --]
On Mon, 6 Jun 2016 10:41:13 -0700
Marc MERLIN <marc@merlins.org> wrote:
> However after the check is over, I still have 29 Current_Pending_Sector on
> that drive.
I had that once, even asked on this list (can't find that now), and it turned
out the pending sector(s) were in the gap between the start of the partition
and the start of the mdadm actual data (which turned out to be surprisingly
large) -- so naturally neither a check nor repair have ever tried to read or
write there.
> More drive details from before I ran badblocks (not an SMR drive):
> Device Model: WDC WD40EFRX-68WT0N0
> Serial Number: WD-WCC4E0642444
At least if it's out of warranty, consider checking the contact pads underside
the drive PCB and cleaning them. AFAIK the WD drives in particular are known to
develop rust there, which can lead to all sorts of problems including transient
"pending" sectors like that.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qmT32VC22PU
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tDTt_yjYYQ8
--
With respect,
Roman
[-- Attachment #2: OpenPGP digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 181 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-06-07 5:35 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-06-06 17:41 Raid check didn't fix Current_Pending_Sector, but badblocks -nsv did Marc MERLIN
2016-06-06 19:10 ` Sarah Newman
2016-06-06 22:44 ` Marc MERLIN
2016-06-07 0:54 ` Phil Turmel
2016-06-07 4:51 ` Marc MERLIN
2016-06-07 13:04 ` Phil Turmel
2016-06-07 13:56 ` Mikael Abrahamsson
2016-06-07 14:04 ` Marc MERLIN
2016-06-08 1:39 ` Brad Campbell
2016-06-08 12:24 ` Phil Turmel
2016-06-07 5:35 ` Roman Mamedov [this message]
2016-06-07 13:57 ` Andreas Klauer
2016-06-07 14:14 ` Phil Turmel
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20160607103531.561755d2@natsu \
--to=rm@romanrm.net \
--cc=linux-raid@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=marc@merlins.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).