From: Lars Ellenberg <lars.ellenberg@linbit.com>
To: Ming Lei <ming.lei@canonical.com>
Cc: linux-block <linux-block@vger.kernel.org>,
Roland Kammerer <roland.kammerer@linbit.com>,
Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>, NeilBrown <neilb@suse.com>,
Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@gmail.com>,
Shaohua Li <shli@kernel.org>, Alasdair Kergon <agk@redhat.com>,
Mike Snitzer <snitzer@redhat.com>,
"open list:DEVICE-MAPPER (LVM)" <dm-devel@redhat.com>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
Takashi Iwai <tiwai@suse.de>, Jiri Kosina <jkosina@suse.cz>,
Zheng Liu <gnehzuil.liu@gmail.com>,
Keith Busch <keith.busch@intel.com>,
"Martin K. Petersen" <martin.petersen@oracle.com>,
"Kirill A. Shutemov" <kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
"open list:BCACHE (BLOCK LAYER CACHE)"
<linux-bcache@vger.kernel.org>,
"open list:SOFTWARE RAID (Multiple Disks) SUPPORT"
<linux-raid@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC] block: fix blk_queue_split() resource exhaustion
Date: Wed, 6 Jul 2016 14:38:41 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20160706123841.GA13335@soda.linbit> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CACVXFVNTKsRQ0PQTL47-ceP-KqMR-zR4DO1v-ey5NTUYv8bUog@mail.gmail.com>
On Mon, Jul 04, 2016 at 06:47:29PM +0800, Ming Lei wrote:
> >> One clean solution may be to convert the loop of generic_make_request()
> >> into the following way:
> >>
> >> do {
> >> struct bio *splitted, *remainder = NULL;
> >> struct request_queue *q = bdev_get_queue(bio->bi_bdev);
> >>
> >> blk_queue_split(q, &bio, &remainder, q->bio_split);
> >>
> >> ret = q->make_request_fn(q, bio);
> >>
> >> if (remainder)
> >> bio_list_add(current->bio_list, remainder);
> >> bio = bio_list_pop(current->bio_list);
> >> } while (bio)
> >
> > Not good enough.
> > Goal was to first process all "deeper level" bios
> > before processing the remainder.
>
> For the reported bio splitting issue, I think the goal is to make sure all
> BIOs generated from 'bio' inside .make_request_fn(bio) are queued
> before the 'current' remainder. Cause it is the issue introduced by
> blk_split_bio().
Stacking:
qA (limitting layer)
-> qB (remapping)
-> qC (remapping)
-> qD (hardware)
[in fact you don't even need four layers,
this is just to clarify that the stack may be more complex than you
assume it would be]
Columns below:
1) argument to generic_make_request() and its target queue.
2) current->bio_list
3) "in-flight" counter of qA.
==== In your new picture, iiuc:
generic_make_request(bio_orig)
NULL in-flight=0
bio_orig empty
blk_queue_split()
result:
bio_s, bio_r
qA->make_request_fn(bio_s)
in-flight=1
bio_c = bio_clone(bio_s)
generic_make_request(bio_c to qB)
bio_c
<-return
bio_list_add(bio_r)
bio_c, bio_r
bio_list_pop()
bio_r
qB->make_request_fn(bio_c)
(Assume it does not clone, but only remap.
But it may also be a striping layer,
and queue more than one bio here.)
generic_make_request(bio_c to qC)
bio_r, bio_c
<-return
bio_list_pop()
bio_c
qA->make_request_fn(bio_r) in-flight still 1
BLOCKS, because bio_c has not been processed to its final
destination qD yet, and not dispatched to hardware.
==== my suggestion
generic_make_request(bio_orig)
NULL in-flight=0
bio_orig empty in-flight=0
qA->make_request_fn(bio_orig)
blk_queue_split()
result:
bio_s, and bio_r stuffed away to head of remainder list.
in-flight=1
bio_c = bio_clone(bio_s)
generic_make_request(bio_c to qB)
bio_c
<-return
bio_c
bio_list_pop()
empty
qB->make_request_fn(bio_c)
(Assume it does not clone, but only remap.
But it may also be a striping layer,
and queue more than one bio here.)
generic_make_request(bio_c to qC)
bio_c
<-return
bio_list_pop()
empty
qC->make_request_fn(bio_c)
generic_make_request(bio_c to qD)
bio_c
<-return
bio_list_pop()
empty
qD->make_request_fn(bio_c)
dispatches to hardware
<-return
empty
bio_list_pop()
NULL, great, lets pop from remainder list
qA->make_request_fn(bio_r) in-flight=?
May block, but only until completion of bio_c.
Which may already have happened.
*makes progress*
Thanks,
Lars
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-07-06 12:38 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 30+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-06-22 8:22 [RFC] block: fix blk_queue_split() resource exhaustion Lars Ellenberg
2016-06-24 11:36 ` Ming Lei
2016-06-24 14:27 ` Lars Ellenberg
2016-06-24 15:15 ` Mike Snitzer
2016-06-28 8:24 ` Lars Ellenberg
2016-06-25 9:30 ` [RFC] " Ming Lei
2016-06-28 8:45 ` Lars Ellenberg
2016-07-02 10:03 ` Ming Lei
2016-07-02 10:28 ` Ming Lei
2016-07-04 8:20 ` Lars Ellenberg
2016-07-04 10:47 ` Ming Lei
2016-07-06 12:38 ` Lars Ellenberg [this message]
2016-07-06 15:57 ` Ming Lei
2016-07-07 8:03 ` Lars Ellenberg
2016-07-07 13:14 ` Ming Lei
2016-07-07 5:35 ` [dm-devel] " NeilBrown
2016-07-07 8:16 ` Lars Ellenberg
2016-07-07 12:39 ` Lars Ellenberg
2016-07-07 12:47 ` Mike Snitzer
2016-07-07 22:07 ` [dm-devel] [RFC] " NeilBrown
2016-07-08 8:02 ` Lars Ellenberg
2016-07-08 9:39 ` NeilBrown
2016-07-08 13:00 ` Lars Ellenberg
2016-07-08 13:59 ` Lars Ellenberg
2016-07-08 11:08 ` Ming Lei
2016-07-08 12:52 ` Lars Ellenberg
2016-07-08 13:05 ` Mike Snitzer
2016-07-07 12:45 ` Mike Snitzer
2016-07-07 22:40 ` NeilBrown
2016-07-07 14:36 ` Mike Snitzer
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20160706123841.GA13335@soda.linbit \
--to=lars.ellenberg@linbit.com \
--cc=agk@redhat.com \
--cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
--cc=dm-devel@redhat.com \
--cc=gnehzuil.liu@gmail.com \
--cc=jkosina@suse.cz \
--cc=keith.busch@intel.com \
--cc=kent.overstreet@gmail.com \
--cc=kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com \
--cc=linux-bcache@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-block@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-raid@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=martin.petersen@oracle.com \
--cc=ming.lei@canonical.com \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=neilb@suse.com \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=roland.kammerer@linbit.com \
--cc=shli@kernel.org \
--cc=snitzer@redhat.com \
--cc=tiwai@suse.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).