From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Mike Snitzer Subject: Re: [PATCH RESENT] dm: Check kthread_run's return value Date: Wed, 6 Jul 2016 09:31:29 -0400 Message-ID: <20160706133129.GB28379@redhat.com> References: <1467645927-4143-1-git-send-email-mnghuan@gmail.com> <20160706131601.GA28379@redhat.com> <20160706132755.GA1712@MinfeideMacBook-Pro.local> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20160706132755.GA1712@MinfeideMacBook-Pro.local> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org To: Minfei Huang Cc: agk@redhat.com, shli@kernel.org, dm-devel@redhat.com, linux-raid@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-raid.ids On Wed, Jul 06 2016 at 9:27am -0400, Minfei Huang wrote: > On 07/06/16 at 09:16P, Mike Snitzer wrote: > > On Mon, Jul 04 2016 at 11:25am -0400, > > Minfei Huang wrote: > > > > > kthread function is used to process kthread_work. And there is no return > > > value checking during create this thread. Add this checking to fix this > > > issue. > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Minfei Huang > > This needed rebasing against linux-dm.git's 'for-next'. I've now staged > > this fix for 4.8 inclusion, see: > > https://git.kernel.org/cgit/linux/kernel/git/device-mapper/linux-dm.git/commit/?h=for-next&id=7193a9defcab6f3d3f1eb64c68bad7534e5a39ad > > Seems that we should fix it in stable as well. Given the code movement it isn't easy to do (by simply adding a stable@ cc). I've not seen a single report of an ignored kthread_run() failure for multipath using .request_fn interface.