linux-raid.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Shaohua Li <shli@kernel.org>
To: Alexey Obitotskiy <aleksey.obitotskiy@intel.com>
Cc: linux-raid@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] md: Prevent IO hold during accessing to failed raid5 array
Date: Tue, 19 Jul 2016 15:46:03 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20160719224603.GB79792@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1468589067-1966-1-git-send-email-aleksey.obitotskiy@intel.com>

On Fri, Jul 15, 2016 at 03:24:27PM +0200, Alexey Obitotskiy wrote:
> After array enters in failed state (e.g. number of failed drives
> becomes more then accepted for raid5 level) it sets error flags
> (one of this flags is MD_CHANGE_PENDING). This flag prevents to
> finish all new or non-finished IOs to array and hold them in
> pending state. In some cases this can leads to deadlock situation.
> 
> For example udev handle array state changes (drives becomes faulty)
> and blkid started but unable to finish reads due to IO hold.
> At the same time we unable to get exclusive access to array
> (to stop array in our case) because another external application
> still use this array (blkid in our case).
> 
> Fix makes possible to return IO with errors immediately.
> So external application can finish working with array and
> give exclusive access to other applications.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Alexey Obitotskiy <aleksey.obitotskiy@intel.com>
> ---
>  drivers/md/raid5.c | 4 +++-
>  1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/md/raid5.c b/drivers/md/raid5.c
> index 6c1149d..99471b6 100644
> --- a/drivers/md/raid5.c
> +++ b/drivers/md/raid5.c
> @@ -4692,7 +4692,9 @@ finish:
>  	}
>  
>  	if (!bio_list_empty(&s.return_bi)) {
> -		if (test_bit(MD_CHANGE_PENDING, &conf->mddev->flags)) {
> +		if (test_bit(MD_CHANGE_PENDING, &conf->mddev->flags) &&
> +				(s.failed <= conf->max_degraded ||
> +					conf->mddev->external == 0)) {
>  			spin_lock_irq(&conf->device_lock);
>  			bio_list_merge(&conf->return_bi, &s.return_bi);
>  			spin_unlock_irq(&conf->device_lock);
> -- 
> 2.7.4

Hi Alexey,

I'm not clear about the race. When we set the MD_CHANGE_PENDING, we will
schedule superblock write, which will eventually finish (either success or
timedout). Why will the IO be hold forever?

Thanks,
Shaohua

  reply	other threads:[~2016-07-19 22:46 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2016-07-15 13:24 [PATCH] md: Prevent IO hold during accessing to failed raid5 array Alexey Obitotskiy
2016-07-19 22:46 ` Shaohua Li [this message]
2016-07-20  6:25   ` Obitotskiy, Aleksey
2016-07-29  9:07   ` Obitotskiy, Aleksey
2016-07-30 21:01     ` Shaohua Li

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20160719224603.GB79792@kernel.org \
    --to=shli@kernel.org \
    --cc=aleksey.obitotskiy@intel.com \
    --cc=linux-raid@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).