From: Shaohua Li <shli@kernel.org>
To: Alexey Obitotskiy <aleksey.obitotskiy@intel.com>
Cc: linux-raid@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] md: Prevent IO hold during accessing to failed raid5 array
Date: Tue, 19 Jul 2016 15:46:03 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20160719224603.GB79792@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1468589067-1966-1-git-send-email-aleksey.obitotskiy@intel.com>
On Fri, Jul 15, 2016 at 03:24:27PM +0200, Alexey Obitotskiy wrote:
> After array enters in failed state (e.g. number of failed drives
> becomes more then accepted for raid5 level) it sets error flags
> (one of this flags is MD_CHANGE_PENDING). This flag prevents to
> finish all new or non-finished IOs to array and hold them in
> pending state. In some cases this can leads to deadlock situation.
>
> For example udev handle array state changes (drives becomes faulty)
> and blkid started but unable to finish reads due to IO hold.
> At the same time we unable to get exclusive access to array
> (to stop array in our case) because another external application
> still use this array (blkid in our case).
>
> Fix makes possible to return IO with errors immediately.
> So external application can finish working with array and
> give exclusive access to other applications.
>
> Signed-off-by: Alexey Obitotskiy <aleksey.obitotskiy@intel.com>
> ---
> drivers/md/raid5.c | 4 +++-
> 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/md/raid5.c b/drivers/md/raid5.c
> index 6c1149d..99471b6 100644
> --- a/drivers/md/raid5.c
> +++ b/drivers/md/raid5.c
> @@ -4692,7 +4692,9 @@ finish:
> }
>
> if (!bio_list_empty(&s.return_bi)) {
> - if (test_bit(MD_CHANGE_PENDING, &conf->mddev->flags)) {
> + if (test_bit(MD_CHANGE_PENDING, &conf->mddev->flags) &&
> + (s.failed <= conf->max_degraded ||
> + conf->mddev->external == 0)) {
> spin_lock_irq(&conf->device_lock);
> bio_list_merge(&conf->return_bi, &s.return_bi);
> spin_unlock_irq(&conf->device_lock);
> --
> 2.7.4
Hi Alexey,
I'm not clear about the race. When we set the MD_CHANGE_PENDING, we will
schedule superblock write, which will eventually finish (either success or
timedout). Why will the IO be hold forever?
Thanks,
Shaohua
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-07-19 22:46 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-07-15 13:24 [PATCH] md: Prevent IO hold during accessing to failed raid5 array Alexey Obitotskiy
2016-07-19 22:46 ` Shaohua Li [this message]
2016-07-20 6:25 ` Obitotskiy, Aleksey
2016-07-29 9:07 ` Obitotskiy, Aleksey
2016-07-30 21:01 ` Shaohua Li
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20160719224603.GB79792@kernel.org \
--to=shli@kernel.org \
--cc=aleksey.obitotskiy@intel.com \
--cc=linux-raid@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).