From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Dan Carpenter Subject: Re: [dm-devel] [PATCH 03/10] md/dm-crypt: Rename a jump label in crypt_message() Date: Fri, 30 Sep 2016 13:06:03 +0300 Message-ID: <20160930100603.GB13620@mwanda> References: <566ABCD9.1060404@users.sourceforge.net> <7c232017-e291-fd2d-5516-26e5150d90df@users.sourceforge.net> <20160929125553.kn45yx6jud35463p@thunk.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org To: SF Markus Elfring Cc: Theodore Ts'o , dm-devel@redhat.com, linux-raid@vger.kernel.org, Alasdair Kergon , Mike Snitzer , Shaohua Li , Julia Lawall , kernel-janitors@vger.kernel.org, LKML List-Id: linux-raid.ids On Thu, Sep 29, 2016 at 05:43:57PM +0200, SF Markus Elfring wrote: > > In what bizzaro world is the "current Linux coding style convention" > > Do you look at the evolution for a document like "CodingStyle"? > Again, I wrote the paragraph in CodingStyle. I just said that it's a good idea to think about label names instead of using GW-BASIC style numbered labels, I didn't say go around bothering everyone with waste of time cleanup patches. I specifically did not say that "out:" or "error:" labels are bad names. Those are common style in the kernel. Please stop sending these patches. regards, dan carpenter