From: Shaohua Li <shli@kernel.org>
To: Song Liu <songliubraving@fb.com>
Cc: linux-raid@vger.kernel.org, neilb@suse.com, shli@fb.com,
kernel-team@fb.com, dan.j.williams@intel.com, hch@infradead.org,
liuzhengyuang521@gmail.com, liuzhengyuan@kylinos.cn
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 03/11] md/r5cache: State machine for raid5-cache write back mode
Date: Mon, 14 Nov 2016 17:22:21 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20161115012221.5holqbeqi542k7pa@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20161110204623.3484694-4-songliubraving@fb.com>
On Thu, Nov 10, 2016 at 12:46:15PM -0800, Song Liu wrote:
> This patch adds state machine for raid5-cache. With log device, the
> raid456 array could operate in two different modes (r5c_journal_mode):
> - write-back (R5C_MODE_WRITE_BACK)
> - write-through (R5C_MODE_WRITE_THROUGH)
>
> Existing code of raid5-cache only has write-through mode. For write-back
> cache, it is necessary to extend the state machine.
>
> With write-back cache, every stripe could operate in two different
> modes:
> - caching
> - writing-out
>
> In caching mode, the stripe handles writes as:
> - write to journal
> - return IO
>
> In writing-out mode, the stripe behaviors as a stripe in write through
> mode R5C_MODE_WRITE_THROUGH.
>
> STRIPE_R5C_WRITE_OUT is added to sh->state to differentiate caching and
> writing-out mode.
>
> When the array is write-through, stripes also go between caching mode
> and writing-out mode.
>
> Please note: this is a "no-op" patch for raid5-cache write-through
> mode.
>
> The following detailed explanation is copied from the raid5-cache.c:
>
> /*
> * raid5 cache state machine
> *
> * With rhe RAID cache, each stripe works in two modes:
> * - caching mode
> * - writing-out mode
'mode' is quite confusing here. it always remainders me r5c_journal_mode. can
you use state?
> + * Note: when the array is in write-through, each stripe still goes through
> + * caching mode and writing-out mode. In such cases, this function is called
> + * in r5c_handle_stripe_dirtying().
> + */
> +static void r5c_make_stripe_write_out(struct stripe_head *sh)
> +{
> + struct r5conf *conf = sh->raid_conf;
> + struct r5l_log *log = conf->log;
> +
> + if (!log)
> + return;
> + WARN_ON(test_bit(STRIPE_R5C_WRITE_OUT, &sh->state));
> + set_bit(STRIPE_R5C_WRITE_OUT, &sh->state);
> +}
> +
> +/*
> + * Setting proper flags after writing (or flushing) data and/or parity to the
> + * log device. This is called from r5l_log_endio() or r5l_log_flush_endio().
> + */
> +static void r5c_finish_cache_stripe(struct stripe_head *sh)
> +{
> + struct r5l_log *log = sh->raid_conf->log;
> +
> + if (log->r5c_journal_mode == R5C_JOURNAL_MODE_WRITE_THROUGH) {
> + BUG_ON(!test_bit(STRIPE_R5C_WRITE_OUT, &sh->state));
> + /*
> + * Set R5_InJournal for parity dev[pd_idx]. This means parity
> + * is in the journal. For RAID 6, it is NOT necessary to set
> + * the flag for dev[qd_idx], as the two parities are written
> + * out together.
> + */
> + set_bit(R5_InJournal, &sh->dev[sh->pd_idx].flags);
if this flag is only for pd_idx disk and you are using it to determine the
stripe data is in journal, why not make it a stripe flag?
Thanks,
Shaohua
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-11-15 1:22 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 32+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-11-10 20:46 [PATCH v6 00/11] raid5-cache: enabling cache features Song Liu
2016-11-10 20:46 ` [PATCH v6 01/11] md/r5cache: Check array size in r5l_init_log Song Liu
2016-11-10 20:46 ` [PATCH v6 02/11] md/r5cache: move some code to raid5.h Song Liu
2016-11-10 20:46 ` [PATCH v6 03/11] md/r5cache: State machine for raid5-cache write back mode Song Liu
2016-11-15 1:22 ` Shaohua Li [this message]
2016-11-15 1:36 ` Song Liu
2016-11-15 1:38 ` Shaohua Li
2016-11-16 0:17 ` NeilBrown
2016-11-16 5:18 ` Song Liu
2016-11-17 0:28 ` NeilBrown
2016-11-10 20:46 ` [PATCH v6 04/11] md/r5cache: caching mode of r5cache Song Liu
2016-11-15 17:03 ` Shaohua Li
2016-11-15 19:08 ` Song Liu
2016-11-15 21:49 ` Shaohua Li
2016-11-16 19:55 ` Song Liu
2016-11-17 17:25 ` Song Liu
2016-11-16 1:08 ` NeilBrown
2016-11-16 5:23 ` Song Liu
2016-11-10 20:46 ` [PATCH v6 05/11] md/r5cache: write-out mode and reclaim support Song Liu
2016-11-17 0:28 ` NeilBrown
2016-11-17 0:57 ` Song Liu
2016-11-10 20:46 ` [PATCH v6 06/11] md/r5cache: sysfs entry r5c_journal_mode Song Liu
2016-11-15 23:35 ` Shaohua Li
2016-11-17 0:29 ` NeilBrown
2016-11-10 20:46 ` [PATCH v6 07/11] md/r5cache: refactoring journal recovery code Song Liu
2016-11-10 20:46 ` [PATCH v6 08/11] md/r5cache: r5cache recovery: part 1 Song Liu
2016-11-16 0:33 ` Shaohua Li
2016-11-10 20:46 ` [PATCH v6 09/11] md/r5cache: r5cache recovery: part 2 Song Liu
2016-11-16 0:37 ` Shaohua Li
2016-11-10 20:46 ` [PATCH v6 10/11] md/r5cache: handle SYNC and FUA Song Liu
2016-11-10 20:46 ` [PATCH v6 11/11] md/r5cache: handle alloc_page failure Song Liu
2016-11-16 6:54 ` Shaohua Li
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20161115012221.5holqbeqi542k7pa@kernel.org \
--to=shli@kernel.org \
--cc=dan.j.williams@intel.com \
--cc=hch@infradead.org \
--cc=kernel-team@fb.com \
--cc=linux-raid@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=liuzhengyuan@kylinos.cn \
--cc=liuzhengyuang521@gmail.com \
--cc=neilb@suse.com \
--cc=shli@fb.com \
--cc=songliubraving@fb.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).