From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Christoph Hellwig Subject: Re: split scsi passthrough fields out of struct request V2 Date: Fri, 27 Jan 2017 17:23:16 +0100 Message-ID: <20170127162316.GA17059@lst.de> References: <1485365126-23210-1-git-send-email-hch@lst.de> <20170127161114.GA501@kernel.dk> <20170127161718.GA16911@lst.de> <775aff8d-6bcc-9cc5-cfa3-dd1c157c95c5@fb.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <775aff8d-6bcc-9cc5-cfa3-dd1c157c95c5@fb.com> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: dm-devel-bounces@redhat.com Errors-To: dm-devel-bounces@redhat.com To: Jens Axboe Cc: linux-raid@vger.kernel.org, linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org, Mike Snitzer , linux-block@vger.kernel.org, dm-devel@redhat.com, Junichi Nomura , Christoph Hellwig List-Id: linux-raid.ids On Fri, Jan 27, 2017 at 09:21:46AM -0700, Jens Axboe wrote: > On 01/27/2017 09:17 AM, Christoph Hellwig wrote: > > On Fri, Jan 27, 2017 at 09:11:14AM -0700, Jens Axboe wrote: > >> I've queued this up for 4.11. Since some of the patches had dependencies > >> on changes in master since for-4.11/block was forked, they are sitting > >> in a separate branch that has both for-4.11/block and v4.10-rc5 pulled > >> in first. for-next has everything, as usual. > > > > Eww. I just had a couple non-trivial updates that I now do again. > > In case you haven't pushed it out yet can you let me repost first? > > Why the eww?! You can't fix this with a repost. Not because of the merge, mostly because I just spent two same time adding all the ACKs, fixing typos and adding the removal of the ->cmd tracing to the series and was getting ready for a repost.