From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 07/18] dm: always defer request allocation to
	the owner	of the request_queue
Date: Fri, 27 Jan 2017 17:36:04 +0100
Message-ID: <20170127163604.GA17337@lst.de>
References: <1485365126-23210-1-git-send-email-hch@lst.de>
	<1485365126-23210-8-git-send-email-hch@lst.de>
	<20170127163434.GA30221@redhat.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Return-path: <dm-devel-bounces@redhat.com>
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20170127163434.GA30221@redhat.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.redhat.com/mailman/options/dm-devel>,
	<mailto:dm-devel-request@redhat.com?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://www.redhat.com/archives/dm-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:dm-devel@redhat.com>
List-Help: <mailto:dm-devel-request@redhat.com?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/dm-devel>,
	<mailto:dm-devel-request@redhat.com?subject=subscribe>
Sender: dm-devel-bounces@redhat.com
Errors-To: dm-devel-bounces@redhat.com
To: Mike Snitzer <snitzer@redhat.com>
Cc: linux-block@vger.kernel.org, linux-raid@vger.kernel.org, linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org, Jens Axboe <axboe@fb.com>, dm-devel@redhat.com, Junichi Nomura <j-nomura@ce.jp.nec.com>, Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
List-Id: linux-raid.ids

On Fri, Jan 27, 2017 at 11:34:34AM -0500, Mike Snitzer wrote:
> Noticed after further review that it seems a bit weird to have the non
> blk-mq support in drivers calling blk_mq_rq_to_pdu().  But I'm not sure
> a blk_rq_to_pdu() macro to blk_mq_rq_to_pdu() is the right thing.  What
> do you guys think?

My first version had an additional name for it, but it caused more
confusion than help.