linux-raid.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Shaohua Li <shli@kernel.org>
To: Tomasz Majchrzak <tomasz.majchrzak@intel.com>
Cc: linux-raid@vger.kernel.org, jes.sorensen@gmail.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] md: add bad block flag to disk state
Date: Wed, 1 Feb 2017 10:12:15 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20170201181215.4d5nfyxmpsmgenks@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20170201095352.GA24920@proton.igk.intel.com>

On Wed, Feb 01, 2017 at 10:53:52AM +0100, Tomasz Majchrzak wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 30, 2017 at 03:33:41PM -0800, Shaohua Li wrote:
> > On Tue, Jan 24, 2017 at 01:03:38PM +0100, Tomasz Majchrzak wrote:
> > > Add a new flag to report that bad blocks are present on a disk. It will
> > > allow userspace to notify the user of the problem.
> > > 
> > > Signed-off-by: Tomasz Majchrzak <tomasz.majchrzak@intel.com>
> > > ---
> > >  drivers/md/md.c                | 2 ++
> > >  include/uapi/linux/raid/md_p.h | 1 +
> > >  2 files changed, 3 insertions(+)
> > > 
> > > diff --git a/drivers/md/md.c b/drivers/md/md.c
> > > index 0abb147..1a807ec 100644
> > > --- a/drivers/md/md.c
> > > +++ b/drivers/md/md.c
> > > @@ -6034,6 +6034,8 @@ static int get_disk_info(struct mddev *mddev, void __user * arg)
> > >  			info.state |= (1<<MD_DISK_WRITEMOSTLY);
> > >  		if (test_bit(FailFast, &rdev->flags))
> > >  			info.state |= (1<<MD_DISK_FAILFAST);
> > > +		if (rdev->badblocks.count)
> > > +			info.state |= (1<<MD_DISK_BB_PRESENT);
> > 
> > Userspace can find if a disk has badblocks by reading the bad_blocks sysfs
> > file. Why adds another interface?
> > 
> > Thanks,
> > Shaohua
> 
> Yes, indeed, it can. I have chosen to do it this way to keep it consistent
> with mdadm which uses GET_DISK_INFO ioctl to get disk information. All data
> provided in this ioctl is also available in sysfs file (rdev state), however
> ioctl is still used (legacy). The same applies for details subcommand of
> mdadm. To answer your question - yes, I could avoid new flag but it would
> make mdadm side of my improvement much more complicated.

I intended to avoid adding new user interface if possible. Not sure about this
case though. How complicated in the mdadm side if we use the bad_block sysfs
file?

Jes, how do you think from the mdadm side?

Thanks,
Shaohua

  reply	other threads:[~2017-02-01 18:12 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2017-01-24 12:03 [PATCH 0/2] Bad block notification Tomasz Majchrzak
2017-01-24 12:03 ` [PATCH 1/2] md: add bad block flag to disk state Tomasz Majchrzak
2017-01-30 23:33   ` Shaohua Li
2017-02-01  9:53     ` Tomasz Majchrzak
2017-02-01 18:12       ` Shaohua Li [this message]
2017-03-06 20:23         ` jes.sorensen
2017-03-07  6:54           ` Hannes Reinecke
2017-01-24 12:03 ` [PATCH 2/2] Monitor: add new event BadBlocks Tomasz Majchrzak
2017-01-29 17:44 ` [PATCH 0/2] Bad block notification jes.sorensen

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20170201181215.4d5nfyxmpsmgenks@kernel.org \
    --to=shli@kernel.org \
    --cc=jes.sorensen@gmail.com \
    --cc=linux-raid@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=tomasz.majchrzak@intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).