linux-raid.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Shaohua Li <shli@kernel.org>
To: Coly Li <colyli@suse.de>
Cc: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.com>,
	linux-raid@vger.kernel.org, Shaohua Li <shli@fb.com>,
	Johannes Thumshirn <jthumshirn@suse.de>,
	Guoqing Jiang <gqjiang@suse.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH V3 1/2] RAID1: a new I/O barrier implementation to remove resync window
Date: Fri, 24 Feb 2017 09:17:24 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20170224171724.4go2ahruap2nqhlq@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <ef194546-a825-7eab-f8cb-e5ee147d065b@suse.de>

On Sat, Feb 25, 2017 at 01:06:22AM +0800, Coly Li wrote:
> On 2017/2/24 上午7:14, NeilBrown wrote:
> > On Thu, Feb 23 2017, Coly Li wrote:
> > 
> >> 
> >> I tried to set up a 4 layer stacked md raid1, and reduce I/O
> >> barrier bucket size to 8MB, running for 10 hours, there is no
> >> deadlock observed,
> > 
> > Try setting BARRIER_BUCKETS_NR to '1' and BARRIER_UNIT_SECTOR_BITS
> > to 3 and make sure the write requests are larger than 1 page (and
> > have resync happen at the same time as writes).
> 
> Hi Neil,
> 
> Yes, the above method triggers deadlock easily. After come to
> understand how bios are handled in stacked raid1 and the relationship
> between current->bio_list, plug->pending and conf->pending_bio_list, I
> think I come to understand what you worried and the meaning of your fix.
> 
> I totally agree and understand there will be hash conflict sooner or
> later now. Yes we need this fix.
> 
> Thanks to you and Shaohua, explaining the details to me, and help me
> to catch up your mind :-)

I'm confused. So the deadlock is real? How is it triggered?

Thanks,
Shaohua

  reply	other threads:[~2017-02-24 17:17 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 43+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2017-02-15 16:35 [PATCH V3 1/2] RAID1: a new I/O barrier implementation to remove resync window colyli
2017-02-15 16:35 ` [PATCH V3 2/2] RAID1: avoid unnecessary spin locks in I/O barrier code colyli
2017-02-15 17:15   ` Coly Li
2017-02-16  2:25   ` Shaohua Li
2017-02-17 18:42     ` Coly Li
2017-02-16  7:04   ` NeilBrown
2017-02-17  7:56     ` Coly Li
2017-02-17 18:35       ` Coly Li
2017-02-16  2:22 ` [PATCH V3 1/2] RAID1: a new I/O barrier implementation to remove resync window Shaohua Li
2017-02-16 17:05   ` Coly Li
2017-02-17 12:40     ` Coly Li
2017-02-16  7:04 ` NeilBrown
2017-02-17  6:56   ` Coly Li
2017-02-19 23:50     ` NeilBrown
2017-02-20  2:51       ` NeilBrown
2017-02-20  7:04         ` Shaohua Li
2017-02-20  8:07           ` Coly Li
2017-02-20  8:30             ` Coly Li
2017-02-20 18:14             ` Wols Lists
2017-02-21 11:30               ` Coly Li
2017-02-21 19:20                 ` Wols Lists
2017-02-21 20:16                   ` Coly Li
2017-02-21  0:29             ` NeilBrown
2017-02-21  9:45               ` Coly Li
2017-02-21 17:45                 ` Shaohua Li
2017-02-21 20:09                   ` Coly Li
2017-02-23  5:54                     ` Coly Li
2017-02-23 17:34                       ` Shaohua Li
2017-02-23 19:31                         ` Coly Li
2017-02-23 19:58                           ` Shaohua Li
2017-02-24 17:02                             ` Coly Li
2017-02-24 10:19                           ` 王金浦
2017-02-28 19:42                             ` Shaohua Li
2017-03-01 17:01                               ` 王金浦
2017-02-23 23:14                       ` NeilBrown
2017-02-24 17:06                         ` Coly Li
2017-02-24 17:17                           ` Shaohua Li [this message]
2017-02-24 18:57                             ` Coly Li
2017-02-24 19:02                               ` Shaohua Li
2017-02-24 19:19                                 ` Coly Li
2017-02-17 19:41   ` Shaohua Li
2017-02-18  2:40     ` Coly Li
2017-02-19 23:42     ` NeilBrown

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20170224171724.4go2ahruap2nqhlq@kernel.org \
    --to=shli@kernel.org \
    --cc=colyli@suse.de \
    --cc=gqjiang@suse.com \
    --cc=jthumshirn@suse.de \
    --cc=linux-raid@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=neilb@suse.com \
    --cc=shli@fb.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).