From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Shaohua Li <shli@kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 05/13] md: raid1: simplify r1buf_pool_free()
Date: Thu, 2 Mar 2017 09:49:42 -0800
Message-ID: <20170302174942.ad3lsrqgvi2erkrl@kernel.org>
References: <1488296503-4987-1-git-send-email-tom.leiming@gmail.com>
 <1488296503-4987-6-git-send-email-tom.leiming@gmail.com>
 <20170228233105.npftquaf3fr5sfpl@kernel.org>
 <CACVXFVO3Nk4NgwTyD5eY9fYHAoshbGx=vnTFFQ_VpmED55=Bjg@mail.gmail.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Return-path: <linux-block-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <CACVXFVO3Nk4NgwTyD5eY9fYHAoshbGx=vnTFFQ_VpmED55=Bjg@mail.gmail.com>
Sender: linux-block-owner@vger.kernel.org
To: Ming Lei <tom.leiming@gmail.com>
Cc: Jens Axboe <axboe@fb.com>, "open list:SOFTWARE RAID (Multiple Disks) SUPPORT" <linux-raid@vger.kernel.org>, linux-block <linux-block@vger.kernel.org>, Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>
List-Id: linux-raid.ids

On Thu, Mar 02, 2017 at 10:11:54AM +0800, Ming Lei wrote:
> Hi Shaohua,
> 
> On Wed, Mar 1, 2017 at 7:31 AM, Shaohua Li <shli@kernel.org> wrote:
> > On Tue, Feb 28, 2017 at 11:41:35PM +0800, Ming Lei wrote:
> >> This patch gets each page's reference of each bio for resync,
> >> then r1buf_pool_free() gets simplified a lot.
> >>
> >> The same policy has been taken in raid10's buf pool allocation/free
> >> too.
> >
> > We are going to delete the code, this simplify isn't really required.
> 
> Could you explain it a bit? Or I can put this patch into this patchset if you
> can provide one?

I mean you will replace the code soon, with the resync_pages stuff. So I
thought this isn't really required.

Thanks,
Shaohua