Linux RAID subsystem development
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Shaohua Li <shli@kernel.org>
To: Song Liu <songliubraving@fb.com>
Cc: linux-raid@vger.kernel.org, shli@fb.com, neilb@suse.com,
	kernel-team@fb.com, dan.j.williams@intel.com, hch@infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] md/r5cache: generate R5LOG_PAYLOAD_FLUSH
Date: Thu, 9 Mar 2017 13:53:31 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20170309215331.dgsyxtp6wr4r7dxh@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20170308014422.4019149-2-songliubraving@fb.com>

On Tue, Mar 07, 2017 at 05:44:22PM -0800, Song Liu wrote:
> In r5c_finish_stripe_write_out(), R5LOG_PAYLOAD_FLUSH is append to
> log->current_io.
> 
> Appending R5LOG_PAYLOAD_FLUSH in quiesce needs extra writes to
> journal. To simplify the logic, we just skip R5LOG_PAYLOAD_FLUSH in
> quiesce.
> 
> Even R5LOG_PAYLOAD_FLUSH supports multiple stripes per payload.
> However, current implementation is one stripe per R5LOG_PAYLOAD_FLUSH,
> which is simpler.

much simpiler than I expected :)
 
> Signed-off-by: Song Liu <songliubraving@fb.com>
> ---
>  drivers/md/raid5-cache.c | 60 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
>  1 file changed, 59 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/md/raid5-cache.c b/drivers/md/raid5-cache.c
> index e69f922..fd0bfea 100644
> --- a/drivers/md/raid5-cache.c
> +++ b/drivers/md/raid5-cache.c
> @@ -590,7 +590,21 @@ static void r5l_log_endio(struct bio *bio)
>  	mempool_free(io->meta_page, log->meta_pool);
>  
>  	spin_lock_irqsave(&log->io_list_lock, flags);
> -	__r5l_set_io_unit_state(io, IO_UNIT_IO_END);
> +
> +	if (list_empty(&io->stripe_list))
> +		/*
> +		 * this io_unit only has R5LOG_PAYLOAD_FLUSH, set
> +		 * to IO_UNIT_STRIPE_END
> +		 */
> +		__r5l_set_io_unit_state(io, IO_UNIT_STRIPE_END);
> +	else
> +		/*
> +		 * io_unit with R5LOG_PAYLOAD_FLUSH and also DATA/PARITY
> +		 * set to IO_UNIT_IO_END and wait for all stripes get
> +		 * handled.
> +		 */
> +		__r5l_set_io_unit_state(io, IO_UNIT_IO_END);

This part along with r5l_do_reclaim change looks strange. Could we call
__r5l_stripe_write_finished here? It makes more sense as we also free io unit
and do other things. The r5l_do_reclaim part looks quite hackish.

Thanks,
Shaohua

      reply	other threads:[~2017-03-09 21:53 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2017-03-08  1:44 [PATCH 1/2] md/r5cache: handle R5LOG_PAYLOAD_FLUSH in recovery Song Liu
2017-03-08  1:44 ` [PATCH 2/2] md/r5cache: generate R5LOG_PAYLOAD_FLUSH Song Liu
2017-03-09 21:53   ` Shaohua Li [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20170309215331.dgsyxtp6wr4r7dxh@kernel.org \
    --to=shli@kernel.org \
    --cc=dan.j.williams@intel.com \
    --cc=hch@infradead.org \
    --cc=kernel-team@fb.com \
    --cc=linux-raid@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=neilb@suse.com \
    --cc=shli@fb.com \
    --cc=songliubraving@fb.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox