From: Shaohua Li <shli@kernel.org>
To: Artur Paszkiewicz <artur.paszkiewicz@intel.com>
Cc: Song Liu <songliubraving@fb.com>,
linux-raid@vger.kernel.org, shli@fb.com, neilb@suse.com,
kernel-team@fb.com, dan.j.williams@intel.com, hch@infradead.org,
jes.sorensen@gmail.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] md/raid5: Add change_consistency_policy to raid4 and raid6
Date: Fri, 24 Mar 2017 10:08:59 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20170324170859.fkbyn5ruqy7xyf5q@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <8acaaf1e-7e67-2c9b-fc1f-7c9237131260@intel.com>
On Fri, Mar 24, 2017 at 04:17:16PM +0100, Artur Paszkiewicz wrote:
> On 03/24/2017 03:45 PM, Shaohua Li wrote:
> > On Thu, Mar 16, 2017 at 03:14:08PM -0700, Song Liu wrote:
> >> Add change_consistency_policy to raid6_personality and
> >> raid4_personality.
> >>
> >> Signed-off-by: Song Liu <songliubraving@fb.com>
> >> ---
> >> drivers/md/raid5.c | 2 ++
> >> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
> >>
> >> diff --git a/drivers/md/raid5.c b/drivers/md/raid5.c
> >> index 88cc898..7a6e7ea 100644
> >> --- a/drivers/md/raid5.c
> >> +++ b/drivers/md/raid5.c
> >> @@ -8408,6 +8408,7 @@ static struct md_personality raid6_personality =
> >> .quiesce = raid5_quiesce,
> >> .takeover = raid6_takeover,
> >> .congested = raid5_congested,
> >> + .change_consistency_policy = raid5_change_consistency_policy,
> >> };
> >> static struct md_personality raid5_personality =
> >> {
> >> @@ -8456,6 +8457,7 @@ static struct md_personality raid4_personality =
> >> .quiesce = raid5_quiesce,
> >> .takeover = raid4_takeover,
> >> .congested = raid5_congested,
> >> + .change_consistency_policy = raid5_change_consistency_policy,
> >> };
> > sorry for the late reply.
> >
> > the change_consistency_policy is only for raid5 for a reason, ppl is only for
> > raid5. I think you need to filter out raid 4/6 in
> > raid5_change_consistency_policy for ppl.
>
> Not necessarily. There is a check in ppl_init_log() that won't allow
> starting ppl if it's not raid5. But it certainly wouldn't hurt.
It will still set the PPL flag for raid4/6. Checking raid 5 in
change_consistency_policy is clearer anyway.
Thanks,
Shaohua
prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-03-24 17:08 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-03-16 22:14 [PATCH v2 1/2] md/raid5: Add change_consistency_policy to raid4 and raid6 Song Liu
2017-03-16 22:14 ` [PATCH v2 2/2] md/raid5: use consistency_policy to remove journal feature Song Liu
2017-03-24 14:48 ` Shaohua Li
2017-03-24 14:45 ` [PATCH v2 1/2] md/raid5: Add change_consistency_policy to raid4 and raid6 Shaohua Li
2017-03-24 15:17 ` Artur Paszkiewicz
2017-03-24 17:08 ` Shaohua Li [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20170324170859.fkbyn5ruqy7xyf5q@kernel.org \
--to=shli@kernel.org \
--cc=artur.paszkiewicz@intel.com \
--cc=dan.j.williams@intel.com \
--cc=hch@infradead.org \
--cc=jes.sorensen@gmail.com \
--cc=kernel-team@fb.com \
--cc=linux-raid@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=neilb@suse.com \
--cc=shli@fb.com \
--cc=songliubraving@fb.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox