From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: "hch@lst.de" Subject: Re: [PATCH 23/23] block: remove the discard_zeroes_data flag Date: Thu, 30 Mar 2017 19:29:15 +0200 Message-ID: <20170330172915.GA24229@lst.de> References: <20170323143341.31549-1-hch@lst.de> <20170323143341.31549-24-hch@lst.de> <1490720411.2573.11.camel@sandisk.com> <20170330090655.GF12015@lst.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Sender: linux-block-owner@vger.kernel.org To: "Martin K. Petersen" Cc: "hch@lst.de" , Bart Van Assche , "agk@redhat.com" , "lars.ellenberg@linbit.com" , "snitzer@redhat.com" , "philipp.reisner@linbit.com" , "axboe@kernel.dk" , "shli@kernel.org" , "linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org" , "dm-devel@redhat.com" , "drbd-dev@lists.linbit.com" , "linux-block@vger.kernel.org" , "linux-raid@vger.kernel.org" List-Id: linux-raid.ids On Thu, Mar 30, 2017 at 11:29:29AM -0400, Martin K. Petersen wrote: > "hch@lst.de" writes: > > > Jens, any opinion? I'd like to remove it too, but I fear it might > > break things. We could deprecate it first with a warning when read > > and then remove it a few releases down the road. > > I know of several apps that check this variable (as opposed to the > ioctl). The above was in reference to both methods..