From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Geliang Tang <geliangtang@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] md/bitmap: use i_blocksize()
Date: Tue, 2 May 2017 22:33:21 +0800
Message-ID: <20170502143321.wjifra4yvnqitc6d@ThinkPad>
References: <0a58b38c7ddfbbc8f56cb8d815114bd4357a6016.1484895399.git.geliangtang@gmail.com>
 <2e7ac27f6ca34bfa01f3b6906fdf409c348e9187.1484895660.git.geliangtang@gmail.com>
 <20170121181307.mbvoe45ca3d7sufv@kernel.org>
 <20170122015030.d6sccz76asvvnvzz@OptiPlex>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Return-path: <linux-raid-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20170122015030.d6sccz76asvvnvzz@OptiPlex>
Sender: linux-raid-owner@vger.kernel.org
To: Shaohua Li <shli@kernel.org>
Cc: linux-raid@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Coly Li <colyli@suse.de>
List-Id: linux-raid.ids

On Sun, Jan 22, 2017 at 09:50:30AM +0800, Geliang Tang wrote:
> On Sat, Jan 21, 2017 at 10:13:07AM -0800, Shaohua Li wrote:
> > On Fri, Jan 20, 2017 at 10:29:52PM +0800, Geliang Tang wrote:
> > > Since i_blocksize() helper has been defined in fs.h, use it instead
> > > of open-coding.
> > 
> > which tree is this patch applied to? I can't find it in Linus's tree
> > 
> 
> This patch is against the last linux-next tree, next-20170120. It
> depends on the patch '2651ed7 fs: add i_blocksize()' which isn't merged
> into Linus's tree yet.
> 
> -Geliang

Hi Shaohua,

The i_blocksize() helper has been merged into Linus's tree already, and
this patch is still valid. Could you please reconsider it if this patch
can be applied?

Thanks.

-Geliang