linux-raid.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Trevor Cordes <trevor@tecnopolis.ca>
To: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.com>
Cc: Continuation of Round Table discussion <roundtable@muug.ca>,
	Adam Thompson <athompso@athompso.net>,
	linux-raid@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RndTbl] Big-endian RAID5 recovery problem
Date: Sat, 6 May 2017 01:41:17 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20170506014117.4d3f1689@pog.tecnopolis.ca> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <87fugio7cy.fsf@notabene.neil.brown.name>

On 2017-05-06 NeilBrown wrote:
> On Mon, May 01 2017, Adam Thompson wrote:
> 
> > The problem is that the disks use the v0.90 metadata format, and
> > they came from a big-endian system, not a little-endian system.  MD 
> > superblocks *since* v0.90 are endian-agnostic, but back in v0.90,
> > the superblock was byte-order specific.
> 
> Look for "--update=byteorder" in the mdadm man page.

Doh!  Make that double-doh!  So easy, yet so hidden.  I'll request one
little tweak/feature: can the man page be updated so that that option
has the word "endian" somewhere in its description?  I think most of us
did as the first attempt at helping: man mdadm, search endian.  When
that failed, no one thought to search byteorder!  Even google didn't
fix that one, at least not for my web searches.

Thanks linux-RAID guys (especially Neil), once again you make the
difficult easy.

  reply	other threads:[~2017-05-06  6:41 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2017-05-01 21:39 Big-endian RAID5 recovery problem Adam Thompson
2017-05-01 21:59 ` Anthony Youngman
2017-05-01 22:33   ` Adam Thompson
2017-05-02  2:47     ` Phil Turmel
2017-05-02  7:29 ` [RndTbl] " Trevor Cordes
2017-05-02  8:59 ` Roman Mamedov
2017-05-05 19:22   ` [RndTbl] " Adam Thompson
2017-05-06  5:57 ` NeilBrown
2017-05-06  6:41   ` Trevor Cordes [this message]
2017-05-07 23:40     ` [mdadm PATCH] Mention "endian" in documentation for --update=byte-order NeilBrown
2017-05-08 17:42       ` Jes Sorensen

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20170506014117.4d3f1689@pog.tecnopolis.ca \
    --to=trevor@tecnopolis.ca \
    --cc=athompso@athompso.net \
    --cc=linux-raid@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=neilb@suse.com \
    --cc=roundtable@muug.ca \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).