From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Dave Stevens Subject: Re: Fault tolerance with badblocks Date: Tue, 09 May 2017 22:00:46 -0700 Message-ID: <20170509220046.394697s39kojrmny@webmail.uniserve.com> References: <03294ec0-2df0-8c1c-dd98-2e9e5efb6f4f@hale.ee> <590B3039.3060000@youngman.org.uk> <84184eb3-52c4-e7ad-cd5b-5021b5cf47ee@hale.ee> <590DC905.60207@youngman.org.uk> <87h90v8kt3.fsf@esperi.org.uk> <1533bba8-41cb-2c50-b28a-52786e463072@turmel.org> <87vapb6s9h.fsf@esperi.org.uk> <87inla73vz.fsf@esperi.org.uk> <5911A371.3030008@hesbynett.no> <878tm65kyx.fsf@esperi.org.uk> <5911AED4.9030007@hesbynett.no> <59121C1C.1050101@youngman.org.uk> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; DelSp="Yes"; format="flowed" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: Content-Disposition: inline Sender: linux-raid-owner@vger.kernel.org To: Chris Murphy Cc: Wols Lists , Linux-RAID List-Id: linux-raid.ids Quoting Chris Murphy : > On Tue, May 9, 2017 at 1:44 PM, Wols Lists wrote: > >>> This is totally non-trivial, especially because it says raid6 cannot >>> detect or correct more than one corruption, and ensuring that >>> additional corruption isn't introduced in the rare case is even more >>> non-trivial. >> >> And can I point out that that is just one person's opinion? > > Right off the bat you ask a stupid question that contains the answer snip! you know Chris, I've read this twice and think it's abusive. You shouldn't do this. Dave -- "As long as politics is the shadow cast on society by big business, the attenuation of the shadow will not change the substance." -- John Dewey