* [PATCH 1/2] bcache: silence static checker warning
@ 2017-06-28 11:47 Dan Carpenter
2017-06-28 11:48 ` [PATCH 2/2] bcache: Update continue_at() documentation Dan Carpenter
0 siblings, 1 reply; 2+ messages in thread
From: Dan Carpenter @ 2017-06-28 11:47 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Kent Overstreet, Jens Axboe
Cc: Shaohua Li, Eric Wheeler, Ming Lei, NeilBrown, Coly Li,
Yijing Wang, Jan Kara, Michal Hocko, linux-bcache, linux-raid,
kernel-janitors
In olden times, closure_return() used to have a hidden return built in.
We removed the hidden return but forgot to add a new return here. If
"c" were NULL we would oops on the next line, but fortunately "c" is
never NULL. Let's just remove the if statement.
Signed-off-by: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@oracle.com>
diff --git a/drivers/md/bcache/super.c b/drivers/md/bcache/super.c
index 8352fad765f6..78004c54f4f6 100644
--- a/drivers/md/bcache/super.c
+++ b/drivers/md/bcache/super.c
@@ -1374,9 +1374,6 @@ static void cache_set_flush(struct closure *cl)
struct btree *b;
unsigned i;
- if (!c)
- closure_return(cl);
-
bch_cache_accounting_destroy(&c->accounting);
kobject_put(&c->internal);
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
* [PATCH 2/2] bcache: Update continue_at() documentation
2017-06-28 11:47 [PATCH 1/2] bcache: silence static checker warning Dan Carpenter
@ 2017-06-28 11:48 ` Dan Carpenter
0 siblings, 0 replies; 2+ messages in thread
From: Dan Carpenter @ 2017-06-28 11:48 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Kent Overstreet
Cc: Shaohua Li, Jens Axboe, Ingo Molnar, Coly Li, Yijing Wang,
linux-bcache, linux-raid, linux-kernel, kernel-janitors
continue_at() doesn't have a return statement anymore.
Signed-off-by: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@oracle.com>
diff --git a/drivers/md/bcache/closure.h b/drivers/md/bcache/closure.h
index 1ec84ca81146..295b7e43f92c 100644
--- a/drivers/md/bcache/closure.h
+++ b/drivers/md/bcache/closure.h
@@ -312,8 +312,6 @@ static inline void closure_wake_up(struct closure_waitlist *list)
* been dropped with closure_put()), it will resume execution at @fn running out
* of @wq (or, if @wq is NULL, @fn will be called by closure_put() directly).
*
- * NOTE: This macro expands to a return in the calling function!
- *
* This is because after calling continue_at() you no longer have a ref on @cl,
* and whatever @cl owns may be freed out from under you - a running closure fn
* has a ref on its own closure which continue_at() drops.
@@ -340,8 +338,6 @@ do { \
* Causes @fn to be executed out of @cl, in @wq context (or called directly if
* @wq is NULL).
*
- * NOTE: like continue_at(), this macro expands to a return in the caller!
- *
* The ref the caller of continue_at_nobarrier() had on @cl is now owned by @fn,
* thus it's not safe to touch anything protected by @cl after a
* continue_at_nobarrier().
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2017-06-28 11:48 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2017-06-28 11:47 [PATCH 1/2] bcache: silence static checker warning Dan Carpenter
2017-06-28 11:48 ` [PATCH 2/2] bcache: Update continue_at() documentation Dan Carpenter
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).