linux-raid.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [PATCH] md/raid5: correct degraded calculation in raid5_error
@ 2017-11-17  2:57 bingjingc
  2017-11-17 18:44 ` Shaohua Li
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 2+ messages in thread
From: bingjingc @ 2017-11-17  2:57 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: linux-raid

When disk failure occurs on new disks for reshape, mddev->degraded
is not calculated correctly. Faulty bit of the failure device is not
set before raid5_calc_degraded(conf).

mdadm --create /dev/md0 --level=5 --raid-devices=3 /dev/loop[012]
mdadm /dev/md0 -a /dev/loop3
mdadm /dev/md0 --grow -n4
mdadm /dev/md0 -f /dev/loop3 # simulating disk failure

cat /sys/block/md0/md/degraded # it outputs 0, but it should be 1.

However, mdadm -D /dev/md0 will show that it is degraded. It's a bug.
It can be fixed by moving the resources raid5_calc_degraded() depends
on before it.

Reported-by: Roy Chung <roychung@synology.com>
Reviewed-by: Alex Wu <alexwu@synology.com>
Signed-off-by: BingJing Chang <bingjingc@synology.com>
---
  drivers/md/raid5.c | 2 +-
  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/drivers/md/raid5.c b/drivers/md/raid5.c
index 31dc25e..98ce427 100644
--- a/drivers/md/raid5.c
+++ b/drivers/md/raid5.c
@@ -2677,13 +2677,13 @@ static void raid5_error(struct mddev *mddev, 
struct md_rdev *rdev)
  	pr_debug("raid456: error called\n");

  	spin_lock_irqsave(&conf->device_lock, flags);
+	set_bit(Faulty, &rdev->flags);
  	clear_bit(In_sync, &rdev->flags);
  	mddev->degraded = raid5_calc_degraded(conf);
  	spin_unlock_irqrestore(&conf->device_lock, flags);
  	set_bit(MD_RECOVERY_INTR, &mddev->recovery);

  	set_bit(Blocked, &rdev->flags);
-	set_bit(Faulty, &rdev->flags);
  	set_mask_bits(&mddev->sb_flags, 0,
  		      BIT(MD_SB_CHANGE_DEVS) | BIT(MD_SB_CHANGE_PENDING));
  	pr_crit("md/raid:%s: Disk failure on %s, disabling device.\n"
--
2.7.4

^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH] md/raid5: correct degraded calculation in raid5_error
  2017-11-17  2:57 [PATCH] md/raid5: correct degraded calculation in raid5_error bingjingc
@ 2017-11-17 18:44 ` Shaohua Li
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 2+ messages in thread
From: Shaohua Li @ 2017-11-17 18:44 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: bingjingc; +Cc: linux-raid

On Fri, Nov 17, 2017 at 10:57:44AM +0800, bingjingc wrote:
> When disk failure occurs on new disks for reshape, mddev->degraded
> is not calculated correctly. Faulty bit of the failure device is not
> set before raid5_calc_degraded(conf).
> 
> mdadm --create /dev/md0 --level=5 --raid-devices=3 /dev/loop[012]
> mdadm /dev/md0 -a /dev/loop3
> mdadm /dev/md0 --grow -n4
> mdadm /dev/md0 -f /dev/loop3 # simulating disk failure
> 
> cat /sys/block/md0/md/degraded # it outputs 0, but it should be 1.
> 
> However, mdadm -D /dev/md0 will show that it is degraded. It's a bug.
> It can be fixed by moving the resources raid5_calc_degraded() depends
> on before it.
> 
> Reported-by: Roy Chung <roychung@synology.com>
> Reviewed-by: Alex Wu <alexwu@synology.com>
> Signed-off-by: BingJing Chang <bingjingc@synology.com>

Applied, thanks!
> ---
>  drivers/md/raid5.c | 2 +-
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/md/raid5.c b/drivers/md/raid5.c
> index 31dc25e..98ce427 100644
> --- a/drivers/md/raid5.c
> +++ b/drivers/md/raid5.c
> @@ -2677,13 +2677,13 @@ static void raid5_error(struct mddev *mddev, struct
> md_rdev *rdev)
>  	pr_debug("raid456: error called\n");
> 
>  	spin_lock_irqsave(&conf->device_lock, flags);
> +	set_bit(Faulty, &rdev->flags);
>  	clear_bit(In_sync, &rdev->flags);
>  	mddev->degraded = raid5_calc_degraded(conf);
>  	spin_unlock_irqrestore(&conf->device_lock, flags);
>  	set_bit(MD_RECOVERY_INTR, &mddev->recovery);
> 
>  	set_bit(Blocked, &rdev->flags);
> -	set_bit(Faulty, &rdev->flags);
>  	set_mask_bits(&mddev->sb_flags, 0,
>  		      BIT(MD_SB_CHANGE_DEVS) | BIT(MD_SB_CHANGE_PENDING));
>  	pr_crit("md/raid:%s: Disk failure on %s, disabling device.\n"
> --
> 2.7.4
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-raid" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2017-11-17 18:44 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 2+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2017-11-17  2:57 [PATCH] md/raid5: correct degraded calculation in raid5_error bingjingc
2017-11-17 18:44 ` Shaohua Li

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).