From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Shaohua Li Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/6] drivers/md/raid5: Use irqsave variant of atomic_dec_and_lock() Date: Wed, 18 Jul 2018 19:44:05 -0700 Message-ID: <20180719024405.GA99813@kernel.org> References: <20180703200141.28415-1-bigeasy@linutronix.de> <20180703200141.28415-2-bigeasy@linutronix.de> <20180716122740.q7oim7te5bybcniz@linutronix.de> <20180717003727.GA128433@kernel.org> <20180718105721.rcd6l7s6l4yfbahg@linutronix.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20180718105721.rcd6l7s6l4yfbahg@linutronix.de> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org To: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, tglx@linutronix.de, Peter Zijlstra , Ingo Molnar , Anna-Maria Gleixner , linux-raid@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-raid.ids On Wed, Jul 18, 2018 at 12:57:21PM +0200, Sebastian Andrzej Siewior wrote: > On 2018-07-16 17:37:27 [-0700], Shaohua Li wrote: > > On Mon, Jul 16, 2018 at 02:27:40PM +0200, Sebastian Andrzej Siewior wrote: > > > On 2018-07-03 22:01:36 [+0200], To linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org wrote: > > > > From: Anna-Maria Gleixner > > > > > > > > The irqsave variant of atomic_dec_and_lock handles irqsave/restore when > > > > taking/releasing the spin lock. With this variant the call of > > > > local_irq_save is no longer required. > > > > > > Shaohua, are you with this? > > > > Acked-by: Shaohua Li > > Thank you. > Is there a reason why you did not apply it or are you too busy now and > do it later (and just signal the ack that you are fine with it)? Since you sent a series, I suppose you want someone else to take it. But I can take it for sure, will do soon. Thanks, Shaohua