From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Ming Lei Subject: Re: [PATCH V10 00/19] block: support multi-page bvec Date: Sat, 17 Nov 2018 10:42:11 +0800 Message-ID: <20181117024209.GD8872@ming.t460p> References: <20181115085306.9910-1-ming.lei@redhat.com> <20181116140314.GA7735@lst.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20181116140314.GA7735@lst.de> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org To: Christoph Hellwig Cc: Jens Axboe , linux-block@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org, Dave Chinner , Kent Overstreet , Mike Snitzer , dm-devel@redhat.com, Alexander Viro , linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, Shaohua Li , linux-raid@vger.kernel.org, linux-erofs@lists.ozlabs.org, David Sterba , linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org, "Darrick J . Wong" , linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org, Gao Xiang , Theodore Ts'o , linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org, Coly Li , linux-bcache@vger.kernel.org, Boaz Harrosh , Bob Peterson , cluster-devel@redhat List-Id: linux-raid.ids On Fri, Nov 16, 2018 at 03:03:14PM +0100, Christoph Hellwig wrote: > It seems like bi_phys_segments is still around of this series. > Shouldn't it be superflous now? Even though multi-page bvec is supported, the segment number doesn't equal to the actual bvec count yet, for example, one bvec may be too bigger to be held in one single segment. Thanks, Ming