From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Ming Lei Subject: [PATCH V13 12/19] block: loop: pass multi-page bvec to iov_iter Date: Fri, 11 Jan 2019 19:01:20 +0800 Message-ID: <20190111110127.21664-13-ming.lei@redhat.com> References: <20190111110127.21664-1-ming.lei@redhat.com> Return-path: In-Reply-To: <20190111110127.21664-1-ming.lei@redhat.com> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: cluster-devel-bounces@redhat.com Errors-To: cluster-devel-bounces@redhat.com To: Jens Axboe Cc: Mike Snitzer , linux-mm@kvack.org, dm-devel@redhat.com, Christoph Hellwig , Sagi Grimberg , "Darrick J . Wong" , Omar Sandoval , cluster-devel@redhat.com, linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org, Kent Overstreet , Boaz Harrosh , Gao Xiang , Coly Li , linux-raid@vger.kernel.org, linux-bcache@vger.kernel.org, Alexander Viro , David Sterba , Ming Lei , linux-block@vger.kernel.org, Theodore Ts'o , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-raid.ids iov_iter is implemented on bvec itererator helpers, so it is safe to pass multi-page bvec to it, and this way is much more efficient than passing one page in each bvec. Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig Reviewed-by: Omar Sandoval Signed-off-by: Ming Lei --- drivers/block/loop.c | 20 ++++++++++---------- 1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/block/loop.c b/drivers/block/loop.c index b8a0720d3653..28dd22c6f83f 100644 --- a/drivers/block/loop.c +++ b/drivers/block/loop.c @@ -511,21 +511,22 @@ static int lo_rw_aio(struct loop_device *lo, struct loop_cmd *cmd, loff_t pos, bool rw) { struct iov_iter iter; + struct req_iterator rq_iter; struct bio_vec *bvec; struct request *rq = blk_mq_rq_from_pdu(cmd); struct bio *bio = rq->bio; struct file *file = lo->lo_backing_file; + struct bio_vec tmp; unsigned int offset; - int segments = 0; + int nr_bvec = 0; int ret; + rq_for_each_bvec(tmp, rq, rq_iter) + nr_bvec++; + if (rq->bio != rq->biotail) { - struct req_iterator iter; - struct bio_vec tmp; - __rq_for_each_bio(bio, rq) - segments += bio_segments(bio); - bvec = kmalloc_array(segments, sizeof(struct bio_vec), + bvec = kmalloc_array(nr_bvec, sizeof(struct bio_vec), GFP_NOIO); if (!bvec) return -EIO; @@ -534,10 +535,10 @@ static int lo_rw_aio(struct loop_device *lo, struct loop_cmd *cmd, /* * The bios of the request may be started from the middle of * the 'bvec' because of bio splitting, so we can't directly - * copy bio->bi_iov_vec to new bvec. The rq_for_each_segment + * copy bio->bi_iov_vec to new bvec. The rq_for_each_bvec * API will take care of all details for us. */ - rq_for_each_segment(tmp, rq, iter) { + rq_for_each_bvec(tmp, rq, rq_iter) { *bvec = tmp; bvec++; } @@ -551,11 +552,10 @@ static int lo_rw_aio(struct loop_device *lo, struct loop_cmd *cmd, */ offset = bio->bi_iter.bi_bvec_done; bvec = __bvec_iter_bvec(bio->bi_io_vec, bio->bi_iter); - segments = bio_segments(bio); } atomic_set(&cmd->ref, 2); - iov_iter_bvec(&iter, rw, bvec, segments, blk_rq_bytes(rq)); + iov_iter_bvec(&iter, rw, bvec, nr_bvec, blk_rq_bytes(rq)); iter.iov_offset = offset; cmd->iocb.ki_pos = pos; -- 2.9.5