Linux RAID subsystem development
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Greg KH <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
To: "Guilherme G. Piccoli" <gpiccoli@canonical.com>
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org, sashal@kernel.org,
	linux-block@vger.kernel.org, linux-raid@vger.kernel.org,
	jay.vosburgh@canonical.com, Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>,
	Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>, Song Liu <songliubraving@fb.com>,
	Bart Van Assche <bvanassche@acm.org>,
	Ming Lei <ming.lei@redhat.com>, Eric Ren <renzhengeek@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [4.19.y PATCH 1/2] block: Fix a NULL pointer dereference in generic_make_request()
Date: Wed, 3 Jul 2019 14:17:00 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190703121700.GE7784@kroah.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20190628221759.18274-1-gpiccoli@canonical.com>

On Fri, Jun 28, 2019 at 07:17:58PM -0300, Guilherme G. Piccoli wrote:
> -----------------------------------------------------------------
> This patch is not on mainline and is meant to 4.19 stable *only*.
> After the patch description there's a reasoning about that.
> -----------------------------------------------------------------
> 
> Commit 37f9579f4c31 ("blk-mq: Avoid that submitting a bio concurrently
> with device removal triggers a crash") introduced a NULL pointer
> dereference in generic_make_request(). The patch sets q to NULL and
> enter_succeeded to false; right after, there's an 'if (enter_succeeded)'
> which is not taken, and then the 'else' will dereference q in
> blk_queue_dying(q).
> 
> This patch just moves the 'q = NULL' to a point in which it won't trigger
> the oops, although the semantics of this NULLification remains untouched.
> 
> A simple test case/reproducer is as follows:
> a) Build kernel v4.19.56-stable with CONFIG_BLK_CGROUP=n.
> 
> b) Create a raid0 md array with 2 NVMe devices as members, and mount
> it with an ext4 filesystem.
> 
> c) Run the following oneliner (supposing the raid0 is mounted in /mnt):
> (dd of=/mnt/tmp if=/dev/zero bs=1M count=999 &); sleep 0.3;
> echo 1 > /sys/block/nvme1n1/device/device/remove
> (whereas nvme1n1 is the 2nd array member)
> 
> This will trigger the following oops:
> 
> BUG: unable to handle kernel NULL pointer dereference at 0000000000000078
> PGD 0 P4D 0
> Oops: 0000 [#1] SMP PTI
> RIP: 0010:generic_make_request+0x32b/0x400
> Call Trace:
>  submit_bio+0x73/0x140
>  ext4_io_submit+0x4d/0x60
>  ext4_writepages+0x626/0xe90
>  do_writepages+0x4b/0xe0
> [...]
> 
> This patch has no functional changes and preserves the md/raid0 behavior
> when a member is removed before kernel v4.17.
> 
> ----------------------------
> Why this is not on mainline?
> ----------------------------
> 
> The patch was originally submitted upstream in linux-raid and
> linux-block mailing-lists - it was initially accepted by Song Liu,
> but Christoph Hellwig[0] observed that there was a clean-up series
> ready to be accepted from Ming Lei[1] that fixed the same issue.
> 
> The accepted patches from Ming's series in upstream are: commit
> 47cdee29ef9d ("block: move blk_exit_queue into __blk_release_queue") and
> commit fe2008640ae3 ("block: don't protect generic_make_request_checks
> with blk_queue_enter"). Those patches basically do a clean-up in the
> block layer involving:
> 
> 1) Putting back blk_exit_queue() logic into __blk_release_queue(); that
> path was changed in the past and the logic from blk_exit_queue() was
> added to blk_cleanup_queue().
> 
> 2) Removing the guard/protection in generic_make_request_checks() with
> blk_queue_enter().
> 
> The problem with Ming's series for -stable is that it relies in the
> legacy request IO path removal. So it's "backport-able" to v5.0+,
> but doing that for early versions (like 4.19) would incur in complex
> code changes. Hence, it was suggested by Christoph and Song Liu that
> this patch was submitted to stable only; otherwise merging it upstream
> would add code to fix a path removed in a subsequent commit.
> 
> [0] lore.kernel.org/linux-block/20190521172258.GA32702@infradead.org
> [1] lore.kernel.org/linux-block/20190515030310.20393-1-ming.lei@redhat.com
> 
> Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
> Cc: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
> Reviewed-by: Bart Van Assche <bvanassche@acm.org>
> Reviewed-by: Ming Lei <ming.lei@redhat.com>
> Tested-by: Eric Ren <renzhengeek@gmail.com>
> Fixes: 37f9579f4c31 ("blk-mq: Avoid that submitting a bio concurrently with device removal triggers a crash")
> Signed-off-by: Guilherme G. Piccoli <gpiccoli@canonical.com>
> Acked-by: Song Liu <songliubraving@fb.com>
> ---
>  block/blk-core.c | 5 ++---
>  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

Both patches now queued up, thanks.

greg k-h

  parent reply	other threads:[~2019-07-03 12:17 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2019-06-28 22:17 [4.19.y PATCH 1/2] block: Fix a NULL pointer dereference in generic_make_request() Guilherme G. Piccoli
2019-06-28 22:17 ` [4.19.y PATCH 2/2] md/raid0: Do not bypass blocking queue entered for raid0 bios Guilherme G. Piccoli
2019-07-02 23:53   ` Song Liu
2019-07-02 23:53 ` [4.19.y PATCH 1/2] block: Fix a NULL pointer dereference in generic_make_request() Song Liu
2019-07-03 12:17 ` Greg KH [this message]
2019-07-03 12:18   ` Guilherme Piccoli

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20190703121700.GE7784@kroah.com \
    --to=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
    --cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
    --cc=bvanassche@acm.org \
    --cc=gpiccoli@canonical.com \
    --cc=hch@lst.de \
    --cc=jay.vosburgh@canonical.com \
    --cc=linux-block@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-raid@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=ming.lei@redhat.com \
    --cc=renzhengeek@gmail.com \
    --cc=sashal@kernel.org \
    --cc=songliubraving@fb.com \
    --cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox