From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Mike Snitzer Subject: Re: Remove WQ_CPU_INTENSIVE flag from unbound wq's Date: Thu, 13 Feb 2020 10:36:45 -0500 Message-ID: <20200213153645.GA11313@redhat.com> References: <20200213141823.2174236-1-mplaneta@os.inf.tu-dresden.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20200213141823.2174236-1-mplaneta@os.inf.tu-dresden.de> Sender: linux-crypto-owner@vger.kernel.org To: Maksym Planeta Cc: Zhou Wang , Herbert Xu , "David S. Miller" , Alasdair Kergon , dm-devel@redhat.com, Song Liu , Gao Xiang , Chao Yu , linux-crypto@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-raid@vger.kernel.org, linux-erofs@lists.ozlabs.org List-Id: linux-raid.ids On Thu, Feb 13 2020 at 9:18am -0500, Maksym Planeta wrote: > The documentation [1] says that WQ_CPU_INTENSIVE is "meaningless" for > unbound wq. I remove this flag from places where unbound queue is > allocated. This is supposed to improve code readability. > > 1. https://www.kernel.org/doc/html/latest/core-api/workqueue.html#flags > > Signed-off-by: Maksym Planeta What the Documentation says aside, have you cross referenced with the code? And/or have you done benchmarks to verify no changes? Thanks, Mike