From: Mariusz Tkaczyk <mariusz.tkaczyk@linux.intel.com>
To: Xiao Ni <xni@redhat.com>
Cc: Song Liu <song@kernel.org>, linux-raid <linux-raid@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/3] md: Set MD_BROKEN for RAID1 and RAID10
Date: Mon, 27 Dec 2021 13:34:29 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20211227133429.00002062@linux.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CALTww29eqakZmp4oiDDZOWZtiz7q2yXCPidBoJVfVpodDcYdzw@mail.gmail.com>
On Wed, 22 Dec 2021 15:24:54 +0800
Xiao Ni <xni@redhat.com> wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 16, 2021 at 10:53 PM Mariusz Tkaczyk
> <mariusz.tkaczyk@linux.intel.com> wrote:
> >
> > There was no direct mechanism to determine raid failure outside
> > personality. It was done by checking rdev->flags after executing
> > md_error(). If "faulty" was not set then -EBUSY was returned to
> > userspace. It causes that mdadm expects -EBUSY if the array
> > becomes failed. There are some reasons to not consider this
> > mechanism as correct:
> > - drive can't be failed for different reasons.
> > - there are path where -EBUSY is not reported and drive removal
> > leads to failed array, without notification for userspace.
> > - in the array failure case -EBUSY seems to be wrong status. Array
> > is not busy, but removal process cannot proceed safe.
> >
> > -EBUSY expectation cannot be removed without breaking compatibility
> > with userspace, but we can adopt the failed state verification
> > method.
> >
> > In this patch MD_BROKEN flag support, used to mark non-redundant
> > array as dead, is added to RAID1 and RAID10. Support for RAID456 is
> > added in next commit.
> >
> > Now the array failure can be checked, so verify MD_BROKEN flag,
> > however still return -EBUSY to userspace.
> >
> > As in previous commit, it causes that #mdadm --set-faulty is able to
> > mark array as failed. Previously proposed workaround is valid if
> > optional functionality 9a567843f79("md: allow last device to be
> > forcibly removed from RAID1/RAID10.") is disabled.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Mariusz Tkaczyk <mariusz.tkaczyk@linux.intel.com>
> > ---
> > drivers/md/md.c | 17 ++++++++++-------
> > drivers/md/md.h | 4 ++--
> > drivers/md/raid1.c | 1 +
> > drivers/md/raid10.c | 1 +
> > 4 files changed, 14 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/md/md.c b/drivers/md/md.c
> > index f888ef197765..fda8473f96b8 100644
> > --- a/drivers/md/md.c
> > +++ b/drivers/md/md.c
> > @@ -2983,10 +2983,11 @@ state_store(struct md_rdev *rdev, const
> > char *buf, size_t len)
> >
> > if (cmd_match(buf, "faulty") && rdev->mddev->pers) {
> > md_error(rdev->mddev, rdev);
> > - if (test_bit(Faulty, &rdev->flags))
> > - err = 0;
> > - else
> > +
> > + if (test_bit(MD_BROKEN, &rdev->mddev->flags))
> > err = -EBUSY;
> > + else
> > + err = 0;
> > } else if (cmd_match(buf, "remove")) {
> > if (rdev->mddev->pers) {
> > clear_bit(Blocked, &rdev->flags);
> > @@ -7441,7 +7442,7 @@ static int set_disk_faulty(struct mddev
> > *mddev, dev_t dev) err = -ENODEV;
> > else {
> > md_error(mddev, rdev);
> > - if (!test_bit(Faulty, &rdev->flags))
> > + if (test_bit(MD_BROKEN, &mddev->flags))
> > err = -EBUSY;
> > }
> > rcu_read_unlock();
> > @@ -7987,12 +7988,14 @@ void md_error(struct mddev *mddev, struct
> > md_rdev *rdev) if (!mddev->pers->sync_request)
> > return;
> >
> > - if (mddev->degraded)
> > + if (mddev->degraded && !test_bit(MD_BROKEN, &mddev->flags))
> > set_bit(MD_RECOVERY_RECOVER, &mddev->recovery);
> > sysfs_notify_dirent_safe(rdev->sysfs_state);
> > set_bit(MD_RECOVERY_INTR, &mddev->recovery);
> > - set_bit(MD_RECOVERY_NEEDED, &mddev->recovery);
> > - md_wakeup_thread(mddev->thread);
> > + if (!test_bit(MD_BROKEN, &mddev->flags)) {
> > + set_bit(MD_RECOVERY_NEEDED, &mddev->recovery);
> > + md_wakeup_thread(mddev->thread);
> > + }
> > if (mddev->event_work.func)
> > queue_work(md_misc_wq, &mddev->event_work);
> > md_new_event();
> > diff --git a/drivers/md/md.h b/drivers/md/md.h
> > index bc3f2094d0b6..d3a897868695 100644
> > --- a/drivers/md/md.h
> > +++ b/drivers/md/md.h
> > @@ -259,8 +259,8 @@ enum mddev_flags {
> > MD_NOT_READY, /* do_md_run() is active, so
> > 'array_state'
> > * must not report that array is
> > ready yet */
> > - MD_BROKEN, /* This is used in RAID-0/LINEAR
> > only, to stop
> > - * I/O in case an array member is
> > gone/failed.
> > + MD_BROKEN, /* This is used to stop I/O and
> > mark device as
> > + * dead in case an array becomes
> > failed. */
> > };
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/md/raid1.c b/drivers/md/raid1.c
> > index 7dc8026cf6ee..45dc75f90476 100644
> > --- a/drivers/md/raid1.c
> > +++ b/drivers/md/raid1.c
> > @@ -1638,6 +1638,7 @@ static void raid1_error(struct mddev *mddev,
> > struct md_rdev *rdev) */
> > conf->recovery_disabled = mddev->recovery_disabled;
> > spin_unlock_irqrestore(&conf->device_lock, flags);
> > + set_bit(MD_BROKEN, &mddev->flags);
> > return;
> > }
> > set_bit(Blocked, &rdev->flags);
> > diff --git a/drivers/md/raid10.c b/drivers/md/raid10.c
> > index dde98f65bd04..d7cefd212e6b 100644
> > --- a/drivers/md/raid10.c
> > +++ b/drivers/md/raid10.c
> > @@ -1964,6 +1964,7 @@ static void raid10_error(struct mddev *mddev,
> > struct md_rdev *rdev)
> > * Don't fail the drive, just return an IO error.
> > */
> > spin_unlock_irqrestore(&conf->device_lock, flags);
> > + set_bit(MD_BROKEN, &mddev->flags);
> > return;
> > }
> > if (test_and_clear_bit(In_sync, &rdev->flags))
> > --
> > 2.26.2
> >
>
> Hi Mariusz
>
> In your first Version, it checks MD_BROKEN in super_written. Does it
> need to do this in this version?
> From my understanding, it needs to retry the write when failfast is
> supported. If it checks MD_BROKEN
> in super_written, it can't send re-write anymore. Am I right?
>
Hi Xiao,
We have discussion about it with Song and as a result a dropped it.
I just left it as before. V2 shouldn't race with failfast because it
still takes care about faulty flag on device (MD_BROKEN is set
additionally).
I don't know a lot about failfast so, idea proposed in first patch could
be wrong. I did it this way because I've updated all md_error() and
later test_bit(Faulty, &rdev->flags) paths, with strict assumption
faulty == MD_BROKEN. For failfast and last_dev it is not obvious.
If you have any recommendation, I will be grateful.
Thanks,
Mariusz
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-12-27 12:34 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 33+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-12-16 14:52 [PATCH v2 0/3] Use MD_BROKEN for redundant arrays Mariusz Tkaczyk
2021-12-16 14:52 ` [PATCH 1/3] raid0, linear, md: add error_handlers for raid0 and linear Mariusz Tkaczyk
2021-12-17 2:00 ` Guoqing Jiang
2021-12-17 2:07 ` Guoqing Jiang
2021-12-19 3:26 ` Xiao Ni
2021-12-22 1:22 ` Guoqing Jiang
2021-12-20 9:39 ` Mariusz Tkaczyk
2021-12-19 3:20 ` Xiao Ni
2021-12-20 8:45 ` Mariusz Tkaczyk
2021-12-21 1:40 ` Xiao Ni
2021-12-21 13:56 ` Mariusz Tkaczyk
2021-12-22 1:54 ` Guoqing Jiang
2021-12-22 3:08 ` Xiao Ni
2021-12-16 14:52 ` [PATCH 2/3] md: Set MD_BROKEN for RAID1 and RAID10 Mariusz Tkaczyk
2021-12-17 2:16 ` Guoqing Jiang
2021-12-22 7:24 ` Xiao Ni
2021-12-27 12:34 ` Mariusz Tkaczyk [this message]
2021-12-16 14:52 ` [PATCH 3/3] raid5: introduce MD_BROKEN Mariusz Tkaczyk
2021-12-17 2:26 ` Guoqing Jiang
2021-12-17 8:37 ` Mariusz Tkaczyk
2021-12-22 1:46 ` Guoqing Jiang
2021-12-17 0:52 ` [PATCH v2 0/3] Use MD_BROKEN for redundant arrays Song Liu
2021-12-17 8:02 ` Mariusz Tkaczyk
2022-01-25 15:52 ` Mariusz Tkaczyk
2022-01-26 1:13 ` Song Liu
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2022-01-27 15:39 [PATCH v3 0/3] Improve failed arrays handling Mariusz Tkaczyk
2022-01-27 15:39 ` [PATCH 2/3] md: Set MD_BROKEN for RAID1 and RAID10 Mariusz Tkaczyk
2022-01-31 8:29 ` Xiao Ni
2022-01-31 9:06 ` Mariusz Tkaczyk
2022-02-08 7:13 ` Song Liu
2022-01-31 12:23 ` Wols Lists
2022-02-12 1:17 ` Guoqing Jiang
2022-02-14 8:55 ` Mariusz Tkaczyk
2022-03-22 15:23 [PATCH 0/3] Failed array handling improvements Mariusz Tkaczyk
2022-03-22 15:23 ` [PATCH 2/3] md: Set MD_BROKEN for RAID1 and RAID10 Mariusz Tkaczyk
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20211227133429.00002062@linux.intel.com \
--to=mariusz.tkaczyk@linux.intel.com \
--cc=linux-raid@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=song@kernel.org \
--cc=xni@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).