From: Roman Mamedov <rm@romanrm.net>
To: Jani Partanen <jiipee@sotapeli.fi>
Cc: David T-G <davidtg-robot@justpickone.org>,
Linux RAID <linux-raid@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: striping 2x500G to mirror 1x1T
Date: Wed, 9 Mar 2022 04:34:47 +0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20220309043447.70281a4d@nvm> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <9b00eff9-1540-228c-60af-d33c32e1b45a@sotapeli.fi>
On Wed, 9 Mar 2022 01:08:47 +0200
Jani Partanen <jiipee@sotapeli.fi> wrote:
> Hello, I don't think you gain really any benefit from that raid-0, just
> go linear array, IMHO.
There is no gain from the linear array either. In none of the performance,
reliability or even simplicity, since managing a linear md array is not any
simpler than managing an md RAID0.
Smaller disks tend to be slower in linear speeds than larger and more densely
written ones. If that is the case with the particular models used here, then
having the 2x500 side in a RAID0 will help them match up in linear speeds to
the 1TB side.
And a very good point that Wols mentioned, the 1TB-disk member can be set as
--write-mostly, since the 2x500GB RAID0 is likely to overshoot the performance
of a single 1TB disk, even if its individual disks were slower. Not to mention
it has two independent head sets for the same amount of data. (If we're still
talking rotational here...)
--
With respect,
Roman
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-03-09 2:40 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-03-05 4:47 striping 2x500G to mirror 1x1T David T-G
2022-03-07 14:19 ` Natanji
2022-03-07 16:24 ` Wols Lists
2022-03-09 3:02 ` backups and losses (was "Re: striping 2x500G to mirror 1x1T") David T-G
2022-03-08 23:08 ` striping 2x500G to mirror 1x1T Jani Partanen
2022-03-08 23:34 ` Roman Mamedov [this message]
2022-03-09 2:59 ` David T-G
2022-03-09 16:04 ` to partition or not to partition (was "Re: striping 2x500G to mirror 1x1T") David T-G
2022-03-09 16:25 ` Roman Mamedov
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20220309043447.70281a4d@nvm \
--to=rm@romanrm.net \
--cc=davidtg-robot@justpickone.org \
--cc=jiipee@sotapeli.fi \
--cc=linux-raid@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).