linux-raid.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Mariusz Tkaczyk <mariusz.tkaczyk@linux.intel.com>
To: song@kernel.org
Cc: linux-raid@vger.kernel.org, guoqing.jiang@linux.dev
Subject: [PATCH 0/3] Failed array handling improvements
Date: Tue, 22 Mar 2022 16:23:36 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20220322152339.11892-1-mariusz.tkaczyk@linux.intel.com> (raw)

Hi Song,
In v4 following changes were made:
- raid1_error and raid10_error description reworked, suggested by Guoqing.
- Error messages for raid0 and linear reworked, suggested by Guoqing.
- check for sync_request replaced by level checks, suggested by Guoqing.

I did manual (mainly on IMSM) tests, here my next TODOs in mdadm:
- broken state handling for redundant arrays in mdadm (it is exposed in sysfs).
  Currently it is working same as before, because broken is not a case for
  redundant arrays in mdadm. It requires to deal with already defined "FAILED"
  state in mdadm.
- Blocking manual removal of devices (#mdadm --set-faulty).

I run following native mdadm tests with and without changes, all passed:
#./test --disks=/dev/nullb[1-5] --tests=00raid1,00raid4,00raid5,00raid6,01r1fail,
01r5fail,01replace,02r1add,05r1failfast,05r1re-add,05r1re-add-nosuper

Mariusz Tkaczyk (3):
  raid0, linear, md: add error_handlers for raid0 and linear
  md: Set MD_BROKEN for RAID1 and RAID10
  raid5: introduce MD_BROKEN

 drivers/md/md-linear.c | 14 +++++++-
 drivers/md/md.c        | 30 +++++++++++-------
 drivers/md/md.h        | 72 ++++++++++++++++++++++--------------------
 drivers/md/raid0.c     | 14 +++++++-
 drivers/md/raid1.c     | 43 +++++++++++++++----------
 drivers/md/raid10.c    | 40 +++++++++++++----------
 drivers/md/raid5.c     | 48 ++++++++++++++--------------
 7 files changed, 155 insertions(+), 106 deletions(-)

-- 
2.26.2


             reply	other threads:[~2022-03-22 15:23 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-03-22 15:23 Mariusz Tkaczyk [this message]
2022-03-22 15:23 ` [PATCH 1/3] raid0, linear, md: add error_handlers for raid0 and linear Mariusz Tkaczyk
2022-04-08  0:16   ` Song Liu
2022-04-08 14:35     ` Mariusz Tkaczyk
2022-04-08 16:18       ` Song Liu
2022-04-12 15:31         ` Mariusz Tkaczyk
2022-04-12 16:36           ` Song Liu
2022-03-22 15:23 ` [PATCH 2/3] md: Set MD_BROKEN for RAID1 and RAID10 Mariusz Tkaczyk
2022-03-22 15:23 ` [PATCH 3/3] raid5: introduce MD_BROKEN Mariusz Tkaczyk
2022-04-08  0:29   ` Song Liu
2022-03-24  7:09 ` [PATCH 0/3] Failed array handling improvements Xiao Ni

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20220322152339.11892-1-mariusz.tkaczyk@linux.intel.com \
    --to=mariusz.tkaczyk@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=guoqing.jiang@linux.dev \
    --cc=linux-raid@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=song@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).