[PATCH] Revert "mdadm: fix coredump of mdadm --monitor -r"

[Nigel Croxon <ncroxon@redhat.com>]

This reverts commit 546047688e1c64638f462147c755b58119cabdc8.

The change from commit mdadm: fix coredump of mdadm
--monitor -r broke the printing of the return message when
passing -r to mdadm --manage, the removal of a device from
an array.

If the current code reverts this commit, both issues are
still fixed.

The original problem reported that the fix tried to address
was:  The --monitor -r option requires a parameter,
otherwise a null pointer will be manipulated when
converting to integer data, and a core dump will appear.

The original problem was really fixed with:
60815698c0a Refactor parse_num and use it to parse optarg.
Which added a check for NULL in 'optarg' before moving it
to the 'increments' variable.

New issue: When trying to remove a device using the short
argument -r, instead of the long argument --remove, the
output is empty. The problem started when commit
546047688e1c was added.

Steps to Reproduce:
1. create/assemble /dev/md0 device
2. mdadm --manage /dev/md0 -r /dev/vdxx

Actual results:
Nothing, empty output, nothing happens, the device is still
connected to the array.

The output should have stated "mdadm: hot remove failed
for /dev/vdxx: Device or resource busy", if the device was
still active. Or it should remove the device and print
a message:

mdadm: set /dev/vdd faulty in /dev/md0
mdadm: hot removed /dev/vdd from /dev/md0

The following commit should be reverted as it breaks
mdadm --manage -r.

commit 546047688e1c64638f462147c755b58119cabdc8
Author: Wu Guanghao <wuguanghao3@huawei.com>
Date:   Mon Aug 16 15:24:51 2021 +0800
mdadm: fix coredump of mdadm --monitor -r

-Nigel

Signed-off-by: Nigel Croxon <ncroxon@redhat.com>
---
 ReadMe.c | 6 +++---
 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

diff --git a/ReadMe.c b/ReadMe.c
index 8f873c48..bec1be9a 100644
--- a/ReadMe.c
+++ b/ReadMe.c
@@ -81,11 +81,11 @@ char Version[] = "mdadm - v" VERSION " - " VERS_DATE EXTRAVERSION "\n";
  *     found, it is started.
  */
 
-char short_options[]="-ABCDEFGIQhVXYWZ:vqbc:i:l:p:m:r:n:x:u:c:d:z:U:N:safRSow1tye:k";
+char short_options[]="-ABCDEFGIQhVXYWZ:vqbc:i:l:p:m:n:x:u:c:d:z:U:N:sarfRSow1tye:k:";
 char short_bitmap_options[]=
-		"-ABCDEFGIQhVXYWZ:vqb:c:i:l:p:m:r:n:x:u:c:d:z:U:N:sarfRSow1tye:k:";
+		"-ABCDEFGIQhVXYWZ:vqb:c:i:l:p:m:n:x:u:c:d:z:U:N:sarfRSow1tye:k:";
 char short_bitmap_auto_options[]=
-		"-ABCDEFGIQhVXYWZ:vqb:c:i:l:p:m:r:n:x:u:c:d:z:U:N:sa:rfRSow1tye:k:";
+		"-ABCDEFGIQhVXYWZ:vqb:c:i:l:p:m:n:x:u:c:d:z:U:N:sa:rfRSow1tye:k:";
 
 struct option long_options[] = {
     {"manage",    0, 0, ManageOpt},
-- 
2.29.2