From: Logan Gunthorpe <logang@deltatee.com>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-raid@vger.kernel.org,
Song Liu <song@kernel.org>
Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>,
Guoqing Jiang <guoqing.jiang@linux.dev>,
Stephen Bates <sbates@raithlin.com>,
Martin Oliveira <Martin.Oliveira@eideticom.com>,
David Sloan <David.Sloan@eideticom.com>,
Logan Gunthorpe <logang@deltatee.com>,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Subject: [PATCH v3 12/15] md/raid5: Check all disks in a stripe_head for reshape progress
Date: Thu, 16 Jun 2022 13:19:42 -0600 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20220616191945.23935-13-logang@deltatee.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20220616191945.23935-1-logang@deltatee.com>
When testing if a previous stripe has had reshape expand past it, use
the earliest or latest logical sector in all the disks for that stripe
head. This will allow adding multiple disks at a time in a subesquent
patch.
To do this cleaner, refactor the check into a helper function called
stripe_ahead_of_reshape().
Signed-off-by: Logan Gunthorpe <logang@deltatee.com>
Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
---
drivers/md/raid5.c | 53 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++------------
1 file changed, 39 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/md/raid5.c b/drivers/md/raid5.c
index f12773c2387a..b27b754ee18c 100644
--- a/drivers/md/raid5.c
+++ b/drivers/md/raid5.c
@@ -5818,6 +5818,40 @@ static bool ahead_of_reshape(struct mddev *mddev, sector_t sector,
sector >= reshape_sector;
}
+static bool range_ahead_of_reshape(struct mddev *mddev, sector_t min,
+ sector_t max, sector_t reshape_sector)
+{
+ return mddev->reshape_backwards ? max < reshape_sector :
+ min >= reshape_sector;
+}
+
+static bool stripe_ahead_of_reshape(struct mddev *mddev, struct r5conf *conf,
+ struct stripe_head *sh)
+{
+ sector_t max_sector = 0, min_sector = MaxSector;
+ bool ret = false;
+ int dd_idx;
+
+ for (dd_idx = 0; dd_idx < sh->disks; dd_idx++) {
+ if (dd_idx == sh->pd_idx)
+ continue;
+
+ min_sector = min(min_sector, sh->dev[dd_idx].sector);
+ max_sector = min(max_sector, sh->dev[dd_idx].sector);
+ }
+
+ spin_lock_irq(&conf->device_lock);
+
+ if (!range_ahead_of_reshape(mddev, min_sector, max_sector,
+ conf->reshape_progress))
+ /* mismatch, need to try again */
+ ret = true;
+
+ spin_unlock_irq(&conf->device_lock);
+
+ return ret;
+}
+
enum stripe_result {
STRIPE_SUCCESS = 0,
STRIPE_RETRY,
@@ -5882,27 +5916,18 @@ static enum stripe_result make_stripe_request(struct mddev *mddev,
return STRIPE_FAIL;
}
- if (unlikely(previous)) {
+ if (unlikely(previous) &&
+ stripe_ahead_of_reshape(mddev, conf, sh)) {
/*
- * Expansion might have moved on while waiting for a
- * stripe, so we must do the range check again.
+ * Expansion moved on while waiting for a stripe.
* Expansion could still move past after this
* test, but as we are holding a reference to
* 'sh', we know that if that happens,
* STRIPE_EXPANDING will get set and the expansion
* won't proceed until we finish with the stripe.
*/
- int must_retry = 0;
- spin_lock_irq(&conf->device_lock);
- if (!ahead_of_reshape(mddev, logical_sector,
- conf->reshape_progress))
- /* mismatch, need to try again */
- must_retry = 1;
- spin_unlock_irq(&conf->device_lock);
- if (must_retry) {
- ret = STRIPE_SCHEDULE_AND_RETRY;
- goto out_release;
- }
+ ret = STRIPE_SCHEDULE_AND_RETRY;
+ goto out_release;
}
if (read_seqcount_retry(&conf->gen_lock, seq)) {
--
2.30.2
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-06-16 19:20 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-06-16 19:19 [PATCH v3 00/15] Improve Raid5 Lock Contention Logan Gunthorpe
2022-06-16 19:19 ` [PATCH v3 01/15] md/raid5: Make logic blocking check consistent with logic that blocks Logan Gunthorpe
2022-06-16 19:19 ` [PATCH v3 02/15] md/raid5: Factor out ahead_of_reshape() function Logan Gunthorpe
2022-06-16 19:19 ` [PATCH v3 03/15] md/raid5: Refactor raid5_make_request loop Logan Gunthorpe
2022-06-16 19:19 ` [PATCH v3 04/15] md/raid5: Move stripe_add_to_batch_list() call out of add_stripe_bio() Logan Gunthorpe
2022-06-16 19:19 ` [PATCH v3 05/15] md/raid5: Move common stripe get code into new find_get_stripe() helper Logan Gunthorpe
2022-06-16 19:19 ` [PATCH v3 06/15] md/raid5: Factor out helper from raid5_make_request() loop Logan Gunthorpe
2022-06-16 19:19 ` [PATCH v3 07/15] md/raid5: Drop the do_prepare flag in raid5_make_request() Logan Gunthorpe
2022-06-16 19:19 ` [PATCH v3 08/15] md/raid5: Move read_seqcount_begin() into make_stripe_request() Logan Gunthorpe
2022-06-16 19:19 ` [PATCH v3 09/15] md/raid5: Refactor for loop in raid5_make_request() into while loop Logan Gunthorpe
2022-06-16 19:19 ` [PATCH v3 10/15] md/raid5: Keep a reference to last stripe_head for batch Logan Gunthorpe
2022-06-16 19:19 ` [PATCH v3 11/15] md/raid5: Refactor add_stripe_bio() Logan Gunthorpe
2022-06-16 19:19 ` Logan Gunthorpe [this message]
2022-06-16 19:19 ` [PATCH v3 13/15] md/raid5: Pivot raid5_make_request() Logan Gunthorpe
2022-06-16 19:19 ` [PATCH v3 14/15] md/raid5: Improve debug prints Logan Gunthorpe
2022-06-16 19:19 ` [PATCH v3 15/15] md/raid5: Increase restriction on max segments per request Logan Gunthorpe
2022-06-16 21:32 ` [Non-DoD Source] " Finlayson, James M CIV (USA)
2022-06-16 21:35 ` Logan Gunthorpe
2022-06-23 4:48 ` [PATCH v3 00/15] Improve Raid5 Lock Contention Song Liu
2022-07-03 7:51 ` Christoph Hellwig
2022-07-03 14:54 ` Song Liu
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20220616191945.23935-13-logang@deltatee.com \
--to=logang@deltatee.com \
--cc=David.Sloan@eideticom.com \
--cc=Martin.Oliveira@eideticom.com \
--cc=guoqing.jiang@linux.dev \
--cc=hch@infradead.org \
--cc=hch@lst.de \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-raid@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=sbates@raithlin.com \
--cc=song@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).