From: Yu Kuai <yukuai1@huaweicloud.com>
To: xni@redhat.com, song@kernel.org
Cc: linux-raid@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	yukuai3@huawei.com, yukuai1@huaweicloud.com, yi.zhang@huawei.com,
	yangerkun@huawei.com
Subject: [PATCH -next 3/8] raid5: fix missing io accounting in raid5_align_endio()
Date: Tue, 20 Jun 2023 04:48:21 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20230619204826.755559-4-yukuai1@huaweicloud.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20230619204826.755559-1-yukuai1@huaweicloud.com>
From: Yu Kuai <yukuai3@huawei.com>
Io will only be accounted as done from raid5_align_endio() if the io
succeed, and io inflight counter will be leaked if such io failed.
Fix this problem by switching to use md_account_bio() for io accounting.
Signed-off-by: Yu Kuai <yukuai3@huawei.com>
---
 drivers/md/raid5.c | 29 ++++++++---------------------
 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 21 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/md/raid5.c b/drivers/md/raid5.c
index cef0b400b2ee..4cdb35e54251 100644
--- a/drivers/md/raid5.c
+++ b/drivers/md/raid5.c
@@ -5468,26 +5468,17 @@ static struct bio *remove_bio_from_retry(struct r5conf *conf,
  */
 static void raid5_align_endio(struct bio *bi)
 {
-	struct md_io_clone *md_io_clone = bi->bi_private;
-	struct bio *raid_bi = md_io_clone->orig_bio;
-	struct mddev *mddev;
-	struct r5conf *conf;
-	struct md_rdev *rdev;
+	struct bio *raid_bi = bi->bi_private;
+	struct md_rdev *rdev = (void *)raid_bi->bi_next;
+	struct mddev *mddev = rdev->mddev;
+	struct r5conf *conf = mddev->private;
 	blk_status_t error = bi->bi_status;
-	unsigned long start_time = md_io_clone->start_time;
 
 	bio_put(bi);
-
-	rdev = (void*)raid_bi->bi_next;
 	raid_bi->bi_next = NULL;
-	mddev = rdev->mddev;
-	conf = mddev->private;
-
 	rdev_dec_pending(rdev, conf->mddev);
 
 	if (!error) {
-		if (blk_queue_io_stat(raid_bi->bi_bdev->bd_disk->queue))
-			bio_end_io_acct(raid_bi, start_time);
 		bio_endio(raid_bi);
 		if (atomic_dec_and_test(&conf->active_aligned_reads))
 			wake_up(&conf->wait_for_quiescent);
@@ -5506,7 +5497,6 @@ static int raid5_read_one_chunk(struct mddev *mddev, struct bio *raid_bio)
 	struct md_rdev *rdev;
 	sector_t sector, end_sector, first_bad;
 	int bad_sectors, dd_idx;
-	struct md_io_clone *md_io_clone;
 	bool did_inc;
 
 	if (!in_chunk_boundary(mddev, raid_bio)) {
@@ -5543,16 +5533,13 @@ static int raid5_read_one_chunk(struct mddev *mddev, struct bio *raid_bio)
 		return 0;
 	}
 
-	align_bio = bio_alloc_clone(rdev->bdev, raid_bio, GFP_NOIO,
-				    &mddev->io_clone_set);
-	md_io_clone = container_of(align_bio, struct md_io_clone, bio_clone);
+	md_account_bio(mddev, &raid_bio);
 	raid_bio->bi_next = (void *)rdev;
-	if (blk_queue_io_stat(raid_bio->bi_bdev->bd_disk->queue))
-		md_io_clone->start_time = bio_start_io_acct(raid_bio);
-	md_io_clone->orig_bio = raid_bio;
 
+	align_bio = bio_alloc_clone(rdev->bdev, raid_bio, GFP_NOIO,
+				    &mddev->bio_set);
 	align_bio->bi_end_io = raid5_align_endio;
-	align_bio->bi_private = md_io_clone;
+	align_bio->bi_private = raid_bio;
 	align_bio->bi_iter.bi_sector = sector;
 
 	/* No reshape active, so we can trust rdev->data_offset */
-- 
2.39.2
next prev parent reply	other threads:[~2023-06-19 12:50 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2023-06-19 20:48 [PATCH -next 0/8] md: fix and refactor io accounting and 'active_io' Yu Kuai
2023-06-19 20:48 ` [PATCH -next 1/8] md: move initialization and destruction of 'io_acct_set' to md.c Yu Kuai
2023-06-20  8:35   ` Xiao Ni
2023-06-21  2:35     ` Yu Kuai
2023-06-19 20:48 ` [PATCH -next 2/8] md: also clone new io if io accounting is disabled Yu Kuai
2023-06-20  8:48   ` Xiao Ni
2023-06-19 20:48 ` Yu Kuai [this message]
2023-06-20  8:52   ` [PATCH -next 3/8] raid5: fix missing io accounting in raid5_align_endio() Xiao Ni
2023-06-20  9:57   ` Paul Menzel
2023-06-21  3:22     ` Yu Kuai
2023-06-19 20:48 ` [PATCH -next 4/8] md/raid1: switch to use md_account_bio() for io accounting Yu Kuai
2023-06-20  9:07   ` Xiao Ni
2023-06-20 13:38     ` Yu Kuai
2023-06-19 20:48 ` [PATCH -next 5/8] md/raid10: " Yu Kuai
2023-06-20  9:10   ` Xiao Ni
2023-06-19 20:48 ` [PATCH -next 6/8] md/md-multipath: enable " Yu Kuai
2023-06-20  9:11   ` Xiao Ni
2023-06-19 20:48 ` [PATCH -next 7/8] md/md-linear: " Yu Kuai
2023-06-20  9:12   ` Xiao Ni
2023-06-19 20:48 ` [PATCH -next 8/8] md/md-faulty: " Yu Kuai
2023-06-20  9:13   ` Xiao Ni
2023-06-20 17:45 ` [PATCH -next 0/8] md: fix and refactor io accounting and 'active_io' Song Liu
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox
  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):
  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20230619204826.755559-4-yukuai1@huaweicloud.com \
    --to=yukuai1@huaweicloud.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-raid@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=song@kernel.org \
    --cc=xni@redhat.com \
    --cc=yangerkun@huawei.com \
    --cc=yi.zhang@huawei.com \
    --cc=yukuai3@huawei.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY
  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
  Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
  before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).