From: Kuan-Wei Chiu <visitorckw@gmail.com>
To: Roman Mamedov <rm@romanrm.net>
Cc: song@kernel.org, linux-raid@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] md/raid5: eliminate if-statements in cmp_stripe()
Date: Mon, 4 Sep 2023 04:10:24 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20230903201024.GD2692213@sivslab-System-Product-Name> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20230903183058.1301b149@nvm>
On Sun, Sep 03, 2023 at 06:30:58PM +0500, Roman Mamedov wrote:
> On Sun, 3 Sep 2023 17:50:59 +0800
> Kuan-Wei Chiu <visitorckw@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > Replace the conditional statements in the cmp_stripe() function with a
> > branchless version to improve code readability and potentially enhance
> > performance.
>
> The new code will always do two comparisons and a subtraction (3
> instructions in total), whereas the old version could return after just 1
> comparison, or after 2 comparisons. So depending on the data values it is 3x
> to 1.5x as much operations performed than before, there unlikely to be any
> enhancement of performance.
>
> Also IMO the previous version is more easily readable.
>
The reason behind my proposed changes was to eliminate conditional
branches in the code. While the original code could occasionally achieve
early returns, many compilers, such as x86-64 gcc 13.2 compiling with
-O2 flag, still generate branch instructions. Processors typically have
deep pipelines, and a branch prediction miss can result in a high
penalty. Therefore, even though early return might not be possible, the
new branchless version of code could still offer efficiency
improvements.
> > The new code calculates the result using a subtraction of
> > comparison results, making it more concise and avoiding conditional
> > branches. This change does not alter the functionality of the code.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Kuan-Wei Chiu <visitorckw@gmail.com>
> > ---
> > drivers/md/raid5.c | 6 +-----
> > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 5 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/md/raid5.c b/drivers/md/raid5.c
> > index 4cb9c608ee19..b14d7ba38f0f 100644
> > --- a/drivers/md/raid5.c
> > +++ b/drivers/md/raid5.c
> > @@ -1035,11 +1035,7 @@ static int cmp_stripe(void *priv, const struct list_head *a,
> > struct r5pending_data, sibling);
> > const struct r5pending_data *db = list_entry(b,
> > struct r5pending_data, sibling);
> > - if (da->sector > db->sector)
> > - return 1;
> > - if (da->sector < db->sector)
> > - return -1;
> > - return 0;
> > + return (da->sector > db->sector) - (da->sector < db->sector);
> > }
> >
> > static void dispatch_defer_bios(struct r5conf *conf, int target,
>
>
> --
> With respect,
> Roman
--
Best regards,
Kuan-Wei Chiu
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-09-03 20:10 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-09-03 9:50 [PATCH] md/raid5: eliminate if-statements in cmp_stripe() Kuan-Wei Chiu
2023-09-03 13:30 ` Roman Mamedov
2023-09-03 20:10 ` Kuan-Wei Chiu [this message]
2023-09-05 20:49 ` Song Liu
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20230903201024.GD2692213@sivslab-System-Product-Name \
--to=visitorckw@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-raid@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=rm@romanrm.net \
--cc=song@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox